• FireTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It was the 31st straight year that the United Nations General Assembly overwhelmingly condemned the crippling U.S. blockade on the socialist nation.

        It doesn’t seem to be having much effect.

        • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          All nations should just start trading with cuba and sanction the US instead. They commit way more war crimes and crimes against humanity than cuba ever could

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Obama did a lot to normalize relationships, attempt to shift internal optics about the current Cuban government, now that Fidel is dead, and pave a way for a diplomatic and politically reasonable end to the embargo. But then the Cheeto came into power.

      • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t think it’s bad behavior any more than sanctions on bad world actors. Cuba knows how to approach the US, and the UN helps nothing.

    • 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Why not? It’s the only power orgs like the UN have in situations like these.

      • Melllvar@startrek.website
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        The UN exists to prevent another major war between great powers. Alienating such powers is counterproductive.

          • Melllvar@startrek.website
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Sure. But we’re talking about an embargo. Everyone has the right to use embargoes, and they’re a time-honored method of non-violent opposition. Framing this as the US transgressing some boundary is hyperbole at best.

            • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              What is the point of this embargo? What is it trying to accomplish? What is worse about the Cuban government, than all the other countries the US doesn’t embargo?

                • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  No it isn’t. Non-violent opposition to what? Everyone also has the right to violent opposition, but the context makes all the difference.

                  • Melllvar@startrek.website
                    cake
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Violence, by definition, is unjustified. But that is also beside my point. Which has to do with the UN, not the embargo.

        • 520@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          So is letting such a power bully another country via pointless economic sanctions. Or do you not remember how Hitler got popular in Nazi Germany?