Meta Faces Legal Challenge by French Publishers Over AI Training
www.bnnbloomberg.ca
French publishers and authors are suing Meta Platforms Inc. for copyright infringement, accusing the tech giant of using their books to train its generative AI.

French publishers and authors are suing Meta Platforms Inc. for copyright infringement, accusing the tech giant of using their books to train its generative artificial intelligence model without authorization.

  • biofaust@lemmy.worldEnglish
    11·
    23 hours ago

    I bring you the example of the Territorial Scope of the GDPR since it is the one I am most acquainted with:

    • This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the Union, regardless of whether the processing takes place in the Union or not.

    • This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union, where the processing activities are related to:

              the offering of goods or services, irrespective of whether a payment of the data subject is required, to such data subjects in the Union; or

              the monitoring of their behaviour as far as their behaviour takes place within the Union.

    • This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data by a controller not established in the Union, but in a place where Member State law applies by virtue of public international law.

    Similar articles are there for the AI Act (which got JD Vance to talk shit about the EU on the 11th February) and the Product Liability Directive.

    This is the reality we live in. Up to you to accept it or not.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      22 hours ago

      GDPR is not copyright, despite all similarities. I assume that you accept that copyright does not work like that, since you are changing the subject.

      Note that the GDPR does not claim to be applicable in third countries; ie outside the territory where EU law is enforced. It only seeks to regulate dealings of outside parties with people in the EU. Even that can’t be practically enforced, usually. Once data leaves the EU, there isn’t much EU governments can do about it, which is why the GDPR has serious rules about data transfers to third countries. (That’s a problem for the fediverse.)

      • biofaust@lemmy.worldEnglish
        11·
        19 hours ago

        As I stated, I am more familiar with the articles of the GDPR, nothing more.

        I expect a company like Meta to have a EU corporate entity and legal representation in the EU, in which case the charges can be applied to the EU entity and authorities may even seize assets within the Union.