• AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    How much ewaste has Microsoft caused just by wanting to sell more copies of the next version of windows.

    • b_van_b@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Windows 10 was released ten years ago. How long do you think they should provide support? For comparison, Redhat gives 10 years for LTS releases, and Ubuntu and Linux Mint give 5 years. Extended support beyond the LTS period requires a paid subscription, similar to Windows.

        • lordbritishbusiness@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The counter is that all of a sudden instead of windows 10 it was 10 from 2020, then 10 from 2022 and so on. Instead of only being the last version it became a succession of short lived versions that people still weren’t upgrading.

      • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They don’t need to support Windows 10, they just need to not artificially block the installation of Windows 11 on old hardware.

      • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 day ago

        On a machine that can run it. If you have one of the machines that are the subject of this article, the only upgrade path is to buy a new one, for which Microsoft takes a healthy OEM fee for including Win11. You can easily see that cost on devices like the Legion Go S that cost significantly less for the SteamOS version.

        • easily3667@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          54 minutes ago

          The technical requirements for 11 were reasonable when it came out and even more so today. Laptops being ewaste when they were built that way isn’t Microsoft’s fault.