• Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “Liberal” means different things in Europe vs America, and that confusion has been specifically exploited by propagandists as well, just making things worse.

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I myself am a stupid american. I cannot say that I’ve read any great works of philosophy that discuss the espoused ideals of political movements.

      What I have read are dictionary definitions. I have observed how people behave, what people think these words mean, and how almost everyone who gives themselves a label is either a liar or just wrong. Obviously, this is about the american versions of the words.

      Liberals: “everything sucks, but it could suck less if we put in a tiny amount of effort to fix things. You may be mildly inconvenienced by these efforts.”

      Conservatives: “everything sucks and it’s the libs’ fault! They changed things and now everything sucks! Fuck {insert racial slur here}!”

      Communists: “everything sucks and it’s the libs’ fault! They’re just as fascist as the conservatives because capitalism!”

      Republicans: “We’re conservatives!” (they’re actually fascists)

      Democrats: “We’re liberals!” (some of them are, but most of them are conservatives. Also spineless failures, but that part isn’t important to this conversation.)

      Am I on to something here, or am I just stupid?

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        yeah, that seems to me how people use these words

        nevertheless, “liberalism” used to have an actual definition. it meant somebody would would say “things are allowed unless they are forbidden”, which is contrary to the anti-liberal (sometimes identified as conservative) view that “things are forbidden unless they are allowed”, which means, liberals don’t bother with things that don’t matter.

        now, if you’re a trans girl shitting in a public toilet, that doesn’t matter because it doesn’t really change anything. that is why liberalism says “ok, it shouldn’t be forbidden, so by default it’s allowed” while anti-liberalists claim “i don’t see why these people are doing this, therefore they are faking it (being trans) and also it should be a crime until proven innocent”.