• rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t understand why certain things are considered in any way “better” than old tech.

    Tachometers and speedometers, for example. These used to be plain rotating wires, hooked (respectively) up to the engine prior to the transmission, or to the driveshaft. Aside from the step-down gears (for the instrument cluster dials), that’s all what they were. So if your tach or sped no longer worked, you knew that in 99% of the cases it was a broken cable, and that’s invariably all that it was. You replaced that for a dollar or five, and you were on your way.

    Now with electronics, the problem scope of a non-functional tach or sped has expanded to thousands of potential points of failure and potentially equally as much in costs in order to effectively repair.

    This doesn’t sound “better” in any shape or form. It just sounds like more ka-ching for the auto companies, as well as a better way to monetize your behavioural use of the vehicle through its computerized Black Box that has an always-on cellular connection to the manufacturer’s mothership.

    • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s better for the manufacturer because it’s cheap, sadly. A screen is way cheaper than dials these days. I don’t know why luxury cars got them first though. Digital dashboards look cheap as fuck