• galanthus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Right, becuase it is surely better for everyone to die childless, and for the humans to become extinct, since we definetly do not live in a period of incredible opulence.

    • nogooduser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The options are many and not just “breed yourself into poverty” and “everyone die childless until the human race goes extinct”.

      • galanthus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I believe that it is the responsibility of society to provide for parents and children. We should make sure raising children is not particularly damaging economically. Saying that they “breed themselves into poverty” is just an excuse not to do that, as it is in this case.

        For this reason, commenting “they will breed into poverty” under a post about tax cuts for mothers is quite misanthropic and idiotic, since it will probably decrease poverty.

    • febra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Better to die childless than produce more slaves for the parasitical oligarch class.

      • galanthus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        A working class life is not quite worthless. I would not prefer it, but it is still worth living. You must think that too, otherwise you would kill yourself.

        Also, they are not slaves in the literal sense, and I suppose, metaphorically, we are all slaves to society.