late edit: DISCLAIMER: The pictured map is not actually a representation of the territories before colonisation. It’s a hypothetical map of what countries there might have been had the continent not been colonised, thus all the names and borders are fictional and have never existed.

For good actual maps, check out native-land.ca.

    • lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you see the lines as approximations, I’m fine with it. There were no borders in the sense that nation states have them today of cause.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        i mean a trivial solution to this is to just use colours with a soft gradient at the edges, you have a rough outline but it’s clear that there is no hard border

      • Blapoo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure. It’s a weird concept seeing these ancient people organized with modern standards in a map like this. I’m sure it would have seemed bizarre to them too.

        Now show me a map of their power grid. Or wealth inequality. Etc

        • lugal@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You want a GDP map of pre-contact America?

          But seriously: don’t call them ancient. That compares them to the ancient people of the old world which they are not. They have a unique history. Call them pre-contact or pre-colonialism or pre-Columbus or something next time

          • Blapoo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t call them people of the old world. That implies the world is only thousands of years old, which it is not.

            Bla bla bla words