• bmsok@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I didn’t know that would be offensive. I really didn’t. I thought my comment was inclusive to everyone. Can anyone tell me how to be more tactful with my words in the future?

    I have very good friends who identify as their true selves in so many ways and I love them all dearly. It would crush me if I don’t learn something from this. To me, a is part of the category I was attempting to include.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      To me, a is part of the category I was attempting to include

      I could be wrong (and I hope @[email protected] will correct me if I am), but I don’t think “a” is a category. I think they were simulating a stutter. The “a- and ppl” is (I think) meant to be pausing and restarting the word “and” halfway through.

        • AceCephalon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          As an Asexual, can confirm, they’re just making a joke with a text based stutter, not referring to Asexual or Agender, such as in “LGBTQIA+” that generally refers to multiple things under the “A”.

          In the latter case, it’s left open ended for inclusivity, rather than arbitrarily excluding other things by specifying.

          As for how the original comment could possibly be more inclusive, it’s harder to say exactly, but I can think of something like “Ladies, Gentlemen, and everyone else”, but I’m not exactly great at fancy words… or words in general… but I try my best.

          • bmsok@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ace is the term I’m familiar with, too. I just didn’t want to be left in the dark if there was an even more abbreviated version of the abbreviation.

    • gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably “third people” is an appropriate term. Like, in the cold war, there was “first” world and “second” world (not discussing which is which), but then there were bystanding parties not participating in the conflict. They used to be called “third world countries”. Happy to help