I’ve wanted to install pihole so I can access my machines via DNS, currently I have names for my machines in my /etc/hosts files across some of my machines, but that means that I have to copy the configuration to each machine independently which is not ideal.

I’ve seen some popular options for top-level domain in local environments are *.box or *.local.

I would like to use something more original and just wanted to know what you guys use to give me some ideas.

  • ohuf@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    RFC 6762 defines the TLDs you can use safely in a local-only context:

    *.intranet
    *.internal
    *.private
    *.corp
    *.home
    *.lan

    Be a selfhosting rebel, but stick to the RFCs!

      • Diligent_Ad_9060@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        https is not a problem. But you’ll need an internal CA and distributed its certificate to your hosts’ trust store.

  • ellipsoidalellipsoid@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    “.home.arpa” for A records.

    I run my own CA and DNS, and can create vanity TLDs like: a.git, a.webmail, b.sync, etc for internal services. These are CNAMEs pointing to A records.

    • Daniel15@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I use *.home.mydomain for publicly-accessible IPs (IPv6 addresses plus anything that I’ve port forwarded so it’s accessible externally) and *.int.mydomain for internal IPv4 addresses.

  • certuna@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    .local is mDNS - and I’m using that, saves me so much hassle with split-horizon issues etc.

    I also use global DNS for local servers (AAAA records on my own domain), again, this eliminates split-horizon issues. Life is too short to deal with the hassle of running your own DNS server.

  • 404invalid-user@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I had problems with .local because it’s used for MDNS and too lazy to figure out how that works so now I just use lan but I also own a .com domain so I have started to use that more

  • DIYiT@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I own both mydomain.com as well as mydomain.me. I use the *.me as my local domain and *.com for the real world.

  • FlowLabel@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    .app is suuuper cheap even for three letter domains. I picked one up for pennies with three letters that mean something to me and my partner and use a pair of redundanct piholes to serve local DNS for that domain. Externally it’s hosted on DigitalOcean for stuff I want external.

  • Spare_Vermicelli@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    maybe not directly answer for you, but I just literally bought 4 domains for 3 euro per year (renews at the same price!) 5 minutes ago :D.

    The catch - it has to be 9 numbers.xyz (see https://gen.xyz/1111b for details).

  • iavael@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve never used DNS in my local network (because it’s additional burden to support, so I tried to avoid it), but couple of month ago when I needed several internal web-sites on standard http port, I’ve just came up with “localdomain.”

    Yep, it’s non-standard too, but probability of it’s usage of gTLD is lowest among all other variants because of it’s usage in Unix world and how non-pretty it is :)

    • tech2but1@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      If DNS is a burden to support you’re doing it wrong. I set it up once and haven’t touched it since. Everything new that gets added “just works”.

      • iavael@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s not like DNS is a huge burden by itself, it’s just approach of avoiding creation of critical services unless they become necessary. Because infrastructure around them is a burden: they needs additional firewall rules on middleboxes, monitoring, redundancy, IaC, backups etc.

        • tech2but1@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t fully follow that but like I said, sounds like you’re doing it wrong if you have to alter firewall rules every time you add a host because of DNS issues.

          • iavael@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I am not speaking about maintainance of DNS zones (that’s easy), but about maintanance of authoritative DNS servers.