• starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      So you would sooner choose to let more people suffer than involve yourself in seeing fewer people suffer. What an awful person you are.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        in the trolley thought experiment, I don’t pull the lever because I’m not a murderer

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah you are. If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice. You don’t get to not involve yourself, not pulling the lever is as much an active choice to kill 5 people as pulling the lever is a choice to kill one.

          You value your own sense of self righteousness over the lives of other people, and that’s awful and selfish.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            not pulling the lever is as much an active choice to kill 5 people as pulling the lever is a choice to kill one.

            that’s not what deontologists believe

            • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I don’t care what deontologists believe. They value their own sense of self-righteousness and moral superiority over the lives of other people, and that’s evil. If you would rather see a woman raped than commit an act of violence against her rapist because committing violence is always wrong, you are evil. If you accept that there are situations where committing acts of violence aren’t necessarily wrong, you aren’t a deontologist and don’t get to use it as an excuse not to pull the lever.

                • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Then you’re not a deontologist. It’s definitional. Actions have inherent moral value, regardless of the situation. If something is ever not permissible, then it’s always not permissible. That’s what deontologists believe, isn’t it? If not, then you’re still taking a consequentialist stance on morality, but with extra steps that allow you to claim that your own inaction is actually the right thing to do, but only when you decided not to take action.

                  If you don’t think violence is always wrong, then what’s your excuse for not pulling the lever, or voting for the person who would cause less suffering? To my eyes, those are situations where the “violence” I’m commiting is permissible because it leads to less suffering than inaction would.

                  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Then you’re not a deontologist. It’s definitional

                    wrong. what does kant think we should do about murder?

                  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    then what’s your excuse for not pulling the lever

                    the categorical imperative. if I were tied to the track I would not want someone to send a trolley hurtling at me when they have the choice not to do that.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                You’re not a deontologist, so I’m not going to take your opinion on what I believe.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            You value your own sense of self righteousness over the lives of other people, and that’s awful and selfish.

            and I’d say you value your own sense of power over the lives of the person you killed.

            • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              That’s totally incorrect. I value the lives of the people that aren’t going to die. Unlike you, I don’t make decisions based on how I personally feel about them, but rather what the outcome will be.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                if you think the ends justify the means, you should look into eugenics! very interesting stuff!