• BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    The graphics look amazing as they did with RDR2, but unless there’s something truly innovative about the open world’s gameplay (like for example persistent, story unessential NPCs or a more dynamic relationship between the player and police) I don’t see a reason to be hyped about this game.

      • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They do, although their additions up until now have been about more content: more vehicles, more space, more detail, more activities, more granularity

        I want to know what’s specifically going to be better or more interesting. I’m honestly happy replaying RDR and GTA V or finally finishing GTA IV and RDR2 because those are all fantastic games.

          • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure, but asset reuse is not about laziness. It’s about prioritizing. If it ain’t broke, don’t waste your time fixing it.

            • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              True. It’s just after all this time between releases, I don’t know, I was just expecting better. For anyone who has been foaming at the mouth over Online, this one’s been a decade in the making. Or however long since they decided to not bother with singleplayer content additions.

              • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Everyone playing the newest Call of Duty has been foaming at the mouth for something new as well. Buying the newest game is not going to manifest something new. In fact, quite the opposite. If more of the same generates them more money with less cost, they will 100% do that.

          • upstream@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Standing on the shoulders of giants” is a saying in science. We build on the work that came before.

            Same with Rockstar. Go back and play GTA III, Vice City, and San Andreas.

            You really feel how these were built on the same engine/platform and how each game kinda just feels like the game they made while making the other game. If you look at the timelines San Andreas came quickly after Vice City (by modern standards at least). Imagine if they didn’t upgrade and reuse assets? If everything was to be built from scratch.

            • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              True but those games came out at a time when they were releasing a game every year or so and there were often still reworks to most of the assets they reused. This is a game that’s coming after a decade of money grubbing. They aren’t a plucky little upstart anymore.

    • bermuda@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      GTA V came out when I wasn’t even in secondary school yet and now GTA VI is supposed to release when I should have a degree.