Claim comes despite draft of bill explaining media regulator will not be empowered to request specific content be removed from digital platforms

  • AnonTwo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    “The ‘mis-information bill’ is particularly dangerous for Christians who want to express an alternate view to the prevailing woke culture on gender and sexuality and for those who want to speak out against abortion,” she said.

    This seems to be the main issue they have with it.

    • aranym@lemmy.name
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The bill still leaves enforcement of specific content up to the platforms… so it seems they’re implying their own posts on these topics would be generally considered misinformation? I respect the honesty lol

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cool so they want to spread misinformation based on religion. I see this as very similar to if they’d said they wouldn’t be allowed to speak out against evolution