Could Bitcoin Millhouse be even less likeable? Yes, the answer is yes.

  • Oderus@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Based solely on the merit of the amendments they’ve proposed, such as changing titles or a single word, they should face some sort of punishment for wasting precious time. It’s clearly meant to do nothing but waste time and guess who pays for it?

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Speaker does that and next time it’ll be amendments created by ChatGPT. Long ones. It’s hard to have a process that cannot be weaponized or deadlocked without removing the process entirely. Or, well, relying on people being good actors.

      • Lauchs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is kind of the fundamental weakness of our system, it relies heavily on people acting in relatively good faith.