• my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You’re not really arguing against the whole crowd there, a lot of people (wrongly) hold the same opinion. The problem is thinking of the door swap as an independent event when it’s not; the result is directly related to the original choice of door. If we label the doors A, B, and C and put the prize behind door A, here’s the possible options:

    Initial Choice A
    - Stick: win
    - Swap: lose
    
    Initial Choice B:
    - Stick: lose
    - Swap: win
    
    Initial Choice C:
    - Stick: lose
    - Swap: win
    

    Two out of three times swapping wins.

    Edit: I see you added a table to your comment, but you’re miscounting pretty badly there. You’re giving double weight to initial choice being correct.

    It is technically true that when you pick A the presenter can open either B or C, but then you need to account for that in your odds; it’s 50% either way so the win/loss rate is halved. In other words:

    Initial Choice A - 33%
    - Presenter opens B - 50%
       - Stick: win (16.5%)
       - Swap: lose (16.5%)
    - Presenter opens C - 50%
       - Stick: win (16.5%)
       - Swap: lose (16.5%)
    
    Initial Choice B - 33%
    - Presenter opens C - 100%
       - Stick: lose (33%)
       - Swap: win (33%)
    
    Initial Choice C - 33%
    - Presenter opens B - 100%
       - Stick: lose (33%)
       - Swap: win (33%)
    

    As shown, including which door the presenter opens does not affect the odds. When sticking, you win (16.5% + 16.5% = 33%) and lose (33% + 33% = 66%), when swapping you win (33% + 33% = 66%) and lose (16.5% + 16.5% = 33%).