• HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also, I don’t think moderation can even stop brigading or the downvotes to hell avalanche. It could only stop thread and comment creation on just your one community/magazine on your instance.

    Nothing could stop a bad faith actor from finding my comments on a different instance and harassing or brigading me there if that instance federated with Threads, even if my instance defederate from Threads.

    This Fediverse stuff is… complex.

    • sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, at least downvotes isn’t going to be much of a problem, as threads users will only be capable of upcoming stuff they see here. They don’t have a downvote button. :)

      • Ragnell@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        They will be able to send swarms of trolls to harass. If Threads does even federate, I suspect even admins who didn’t sign the fedipact will defederate quite fast.

        • sab@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The way the Fediverse is designed you need to actively seek out content. It’s not going to be all that easy being a troll from threads attacking content on the Fediverse.

          What I could imagine is that bigots might seek out LGTBQIA+ hashtags (along with hashtags related to other culture war dimensions), and find content from the Fediverse that way,

          Then again, if that proves to be a problem, sites like Blahaj will probably be pretty darn quick to defederate. And this type of content, even when posted by kbin or Lemmy.world users or whatever, will probably often take place in communities hosted by instances like blahaj. So the thread trolls would find themselves isolated from the discussion pretty fast.

          On the other hand, there’s a bunch of queer people who use threads. If all servers immediately defederate from it, these people will never get to have a glimpse into the fediverse. They could benefit a lot from joining a different platform, but if we focus only on the bigots we’ll end up never reaching them.

          The same logic of course applies to other communities affected by the anti woke culture war bullshit, I’m just too lazy to come up with a more original example. :)

          • Ragnell@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t know, a lot of us found our way here from Reddit and Twitter without being federated.

            • sab@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That’s different though - it’s going here and actively creating a user and settling. Interactions with Mastodon users are mostly limited to special interest groups and microblogs I feel, even though we’re all in the same network.

              • Ragnell@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                So we have the problem of protecting the vulnerable on our instances, while inviting the vulnerable from their instances.

                I wonder if we could create Ambassador instances, where you have an account that basically posts to two instances: one that federates to Threads, and one that federates to the rest of the Fediverse.