produnis@discuss.tchncs.de to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoscalediscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1715arrow-down110
arrow-up1705arrow-down1imagescalediscuss.tchncs.deprodunis@discuss.tchncs.de to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareDohnakun@lemmy.fmhy.mlBlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-21 year agoI don’t get why we research DNA as storage. It is sensible as fuck, deteriorates quickly, is slow to write and read… Only advantage it’s bio-compatibility
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-21 year agoThe information density is insane, both volumetric and by mass. I sort of agree, though. With current methods it seems like it would probably be just as easy to record information in a synthetic polymer.
I don’t get why we research DNA as storage.
It is sensible as fuck, deteriorates quickly, is slow to write and read…
Only advantage it’s bio-compatibility
The information density is insane, both volumetric and by mass.
I sort of agree, though. With current methods it seems like it would probably be just as easy to record information in a synthetic polymer.