• Koro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    While that may be, companies should not be able to have a stronghold on what should be considered a basic human need. Housing is already in pretty short supply, and it’s worsened by the fact that these companies buy a considerable chunk of this short supply and then turn the purchased properties into rentals.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      “buying one home and turning it into 4 home reduces the amount of homes” and other fun takes.

      • Koro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Buying a house and renting it out to families that were wanting to buy it outright in the first place” FTFY

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh I’m sorry, do 4 families generally get together and purchase a house as a collective?

      • deejay4am@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Buying one home and charging 4x as much for it” is the actual problem, but I suppose you have your head in the sand by default when the large boot of capitalism is on your neck.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Strong disagree. People having homes where they otherwise would not is a feature, not a bug.

          If you want prices down, you must increase supply