Context

There have been a lot of posts and comments recently about Facebook entering the fediverse, and how different instances will handle it. Many people have asked me to commit to pre-emptively defederating from Threads before they even implement ActivityPub.

The lemm.ee federation policy states that it’s not a goal for lemm.ee to curate content for our users, but we will certainly defederate any server which aims to systematically break our rules. I want to point out here that Facebook makes essentially all of its money from advertising, and lemm.ee has a no advertising rule - basically, Facebook has a built-in financial incentive to break our rules. ActivityPub has no protections against advertising, so it’s likely we will end up having to eventually defederate from Threads just for this reason alone.

However, I would still like to get a feel for how many people in our instance are actually excited for potential federation with Threads. While personally I feel that any theoretical pros are by far outweighed by cons, I do want to use this opportunity to see how much of the community disagrees with me. I am not intending to run this instance as a democracy (sorry if anybody is disappointed by that), but I would still like to have a clear picture of user feedback for potentially major decisions such as this one. This is why I am asking every user who wants lemm.ee to federate with Facebook to please downvote this post.

Here are some reasons why I personally believe that Threads will have a negative effect on the fediverse

  • As mentioned above, Facebook is completely driven by ad revenue. There is nothing stopping them from sending out ads as posts/comments with artificially inflated scores, which would ensure that their ads end up on the “all” page of federated servers.
  • Threads already has more users than all Lemmy instances combined. Even if their algorithms don’t apply to the rest of the fediverse directly, they can still completely dictate what the “all” page will look like for all instances by simply controlling what their own users see and vote on.
  • Moderation does not seem to be a priority for Threads so far, meaning that they would create massive moderation workloads for smaller instances.
  • In general, Facebook has shown countless times that they don’t have their users best interests in mind. They view users as something to exploit for revenue. There are probably ways they are already thinking about hurting the fediverse that we can’t even imagine yet.

By the way, we’re not really in any rush today with our decision regarding federation

  • Threads does not have ActivityPub support yet today
  • Even if they add ActivityPub support, their UX is geared towards Mastodon-like usage - it seems unlikely that there would ever be proper interoperability between Threads and Lemmy
  • We don’t really know what to defederate from - it’s completely possible that “threads.net” will not be their ActivityPub domain at all.

So go ahead and downvote if you feel defederation would be a mistake, and feel free to share your thoughts in the comments! It would be super helpful to me if folks who are in favor of federating with Threads could leave a comment explaining their reasoning.

Update:

By now, it’s clear that there is a group of users who are in favor of federating with Threads. The breakdown is like this (based on downvotes):

  • lemm.ee users: 136 in favor of federating with Threads
  • Others: 288 in favor of federating with Threads

While it seems to be a minority, it’s still quite a few users. There is no way to please all users in this situation - any decision I make will certainly inconvenience some of you, and I apologize for that.

A big thanks to everybody who has shared opinions and arguments in comments so far. I think there are several well written comments that have been unfairly downvoted, but I have personally read all comments and tried to respond to several as well. I will keep reading them as they come in.

The main facts I am working with right now are as follows:

  • The majority of lemm.ee users are strongly opposed to immediately federating with Threads
  • Facebook has a proven track record of exploiting users (and a built-in financial incentive to do so)
  • We currently lack proper federation/moderation tools to allow us to properly handle rule breaking content from Facebook

Considering all of the above, I believe the initial approach for lemm.ee should be to defederate Threads, and then monitor the situation for a period of time to determine if federating with them in the future is a realistic option

In order to federate with them, the following conditions would need to be fulfilled:

  • There needs to be actual interoperability between Threads and Lemmy
  • Threads needs to prove that they are not flooding instances with rule-breaking content (mainly ads and bigotry for lemm.ee)
  • There needs to be a mechanism to prevent feed manipulation by Threads algorithms (potentially this means discarding all incoming votes from Threads)

Note: this is an initial list, subject to change as we learn more about Threads.

Again, I realize this approach won’t please everybody, but I really believe it’s the best approach on a whole for now. Please feel free to keep adding comments and keep the discussion going if you think there is something I have not considered.

  • moriarty@lemm.ee
    34·
    1 year ago

    In favor of federating

    1. Presumption of innocence - until they actually push ads to ActivityPub, there’s no formal reason to defederate. The moment they do - cut the cord
    2. Same thing with EEE - defederate the moment they change the protocol unilaterally, not before
    3. It’s a stress test for Lemmy. What if lemme.world grows 100x and dominates the global feed - it’ll be sad if our only solution at that point was to defederate from them
    4. Federation does not give Facebook more ads data: entire ActivityPub ecosystem is open and scrapable, they will still know that [email protected] asked a question about growing shrooms
    • redballooon@lemm.ee
      4·
      1 year ago

      Why should we presume the innocence of Marc Zuckerberg? He got his reputation because he has governed Facebook/Meta since their inception.

    • Cabrio@lemmy.world
      2·
      1 year ago

      Presumption of innocence

      How can you make that presumption with 20 years of evidence to the contrary? Does your cognizance of the company reset with each new action they take?

    • sunaurus@lemm.eeOPM
      2·
      1 year ago

      Thank you! Interesting points. The stress test in particular would indeed be super valuable, and would probably result in another round of optimizations being found for Lemmy.

      I’m leaning towards not presuming any innocence for them, though - just having a new app does not really take away their track record.

    • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
      31·
      1 year ago

      They’re already guilty… it’s fucking Facebook. They’re an algorithm for social control, data aggragation, and advertising. They cannot do otherwise. You’re an absolute fool for thinking otherwise… or maybe a paid goon. They don’t deserve a chance. They’re just a corporation, not a bunch of nerds trying to connect.

    • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
      1·
      1 year ago
      1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Facebook

      This article may be too long to read and navigate comfortably. Its current readable prose size is 108 kilobytes.

      1. They cannot change the protocol unilaterally. What they can do is add new, proprietary features incompatible with the protocol to their own apps to disadvantage competitors.

      2. It seems unlikely this could happen. It hasn’t happened to Mastodon either, why should it happen to Lemmy? In addition, if Threads decided to federate, no instance would be capable of handling the load hundreds of millions of posts from Threads would generate for quite some time, I assume. Lemmy has currently one million total posts.

      3. They need consent in order to use and process any of the data from each user or they’ll receive even more fines - at least in the EU. They’d have to limit scraping to non-EU citizens, which is an impossible task.

      • moriarty@lemm.ee
        12·
        1 year ago
        1. That’s exactly what I mean by changing the protocol unilaterally, without changing the standard. The way I see it: if they play fair and work with community on extending the standard, that’s a good thing. If they start creating non-standard extensions, ban them
        2. Don’t we want the fediverse to grow though, one way or another (a few large instances or several medium-sized)? If that’s the case, we’ll have to deal with the scale at some point
        3. Legit question - is this really how it works? My understanding is: indexing public internet is fair game. Google scrape(d) Reddit and twitter and indexed with no issue. So I’m assuming fediverse will be indexed. The missing link for ads is knowing that buttface17 is “John Johnson” on Facebook - does this problem become easier if we federate with them?
        • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
          1·
          1 year ago

          1. I’m afraid something like this could happen. After all, the Fediverse is competition in Meta’s point of view because Meta cannot advertise to everyone.

          2. Growth is great, but it must grow sustainably. Spontaneous growth is harmful because the necessary structures, such as powerful (enough) servers, moderation tools or even the number of capable moderators haven’t evolved alongside the user increase.

          3. Scraping is legal, I believe, but using the scraped data for profiling is probably not. And just a few days ago the EU court has ruled that because of Meta’s dominant market position, forcing users to agree to data collection can be an abuse of said position. This may only be tangentially related but there’s no doubt this has implications for Meta’s involvement in the Fediverse.