• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    6 months ago

    Very fitting headline in a day and age where I’m constantly seeing people advocating for giving trump the Whitehouse and finishing the country off because anything less would be SuPpOrTiNg GeNoCiDe. As if the move to help Palestinians would be to elect Trump. These people are very stupid children, bots, or Russian paid actors. Impossible to know which.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Russian paid actors.

      I got into that exact argument about Biden. Eventually I called the person a Putin puppet and got my post deleted by a Lemmy.world mod.

      • Aqarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        So, you got into an argument, turned to insults, and moderation kicked in. Sounds like everything is working OK.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          You’re exactly right, and you proved your own point with this comment thread. It’s really sad that people can’t be polite and think they have to resort to ad hominem crap.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Sounds overzealous to me. Wrapped up in that is the assumption that associating a person with Putin is said as just a way to hurt feelings, rather than a perhaps-assuming claim… before yesterday, it never once occurred to me that a mod would have an issue with a claim of association that cannot be proven either way. Might as well start banning people for telling each other they’re wrong.

          • Aqarius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Wrapped up in that is the assumption that associating a person with Putin is said as just a way to hurt feelings, rather than a perhaps-assuming claim… before yesterday, it never once occurred to me that a mod would have an issue with a claim of association that cannot be proven either way. Might as well start banning people for telling each other they’re wrong.

            So, if I were to hit you with a claim of association that cannot be proven either way, but just so happens to conveniently dismiss anything you said, and anything you might say in response, you wouldn’t consider that a personal attack?

            Fine by me: How much is Putin paying you to sow bad-faith arguments among non-republicans?

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I am frequently hit with much worse “attacks” than this and I laugh at and ignore the vast majority of them. Even when someone’s particularly good at being personally insulting (this example is NOT) I rarely get hurt by it.

              • Aqarius@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Ah, so you do, in fact, recognize it as an attack, a personally insulting one, with the intention “to hurt feelings”, and not a “perhaps-assuming claim” you present it when trying to justify not getting banned for being an asshole.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  recognize it as an attack, a personally insulting one, with the intention “to hurt feelings”,

                  Precisely what I strongly dispute. It’s only an insult if you have no idea what an actual insult is.

                  trying to justify not getting banned for being an asshole.

                  Kinda ironic that you did not even read the conversation, and you get to call me an asshole in the same breath as telling me I was insulting, which again since you didn’t read the conversation you’re pulling that assumption straight from your rectum anyhow.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Annnnd I was banned from politics on lemmy.world. this is actually kind of messed up. I don’t think I said anything particularly offensive even. It seems like it was more about my message.

        • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I was banned from all of . world for shit posting in a running group by saying I’m too fat to run. The group crossed my feed when I was sorting by all and I said it just for shits and giggles.

          That got me banned but when I went on the discord and asked about this another mod came along and reversed it.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        The “automod” just removed 5 of my comments for complete bullshit reasons, but it honestly does seem like they did it in response to the exact same issue – I claimed someone is a russian actor. I’m now wondering who runs lemmy.world, and what exact agenda they have.

        Despite it claiming “automod” there were human-written reasons, one of which was “Provide evidence of shilling or this is personal insult.”

        • Might Be@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You do realize I read Lemmy right?

          No, they were reported multiple times, and I removed them by hand, no bots were involved.

          Like I said in the modlog, if you have actual evidence of botting, let’s see it, otherwise, you are intentionally antagonizing people, and I can’t let you do that.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            It seems like you assume I know a lot of things I either don’t know or forgot about. Forgot about the modlog, still even looking there, it’s missing detail, such as someone to message to ask a question. Also, … “abelist insults”, really? I believe I wrote a couple things like “what is wrong with your brain?” which would not be taken as seriously by anyone I know.

            I did see the message about providing evidence of shilling… I am just curious what would constitute such evidence? In my experience you could almost never prove it, and ironically that is what the parent post above is literally about.

            • Might Be@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              It seems like you assume I know a lot of things I either don’t know or forgot about.

              You admit that you have no evidence at all, and you are going around calling people who disagree with you “Russian bots”?

              Suspicious voting patterns, repetitive spam messages, all of these would constitute as evidence, and our admins ban these spam bots usually within minutes.

              "what is wrong with your brain?” which would not be taken as seriously by anyone I know.

              You are going around and calling people stupid," it’s just a joke bro" is not going to cut it. Ironic prejudice is still prejudice.

              I don’t want to argue with you more. Take the next 3 days off, talk about something else, think about how you can contribute positively before you come back.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                You admit that you have no evidence at all, and you are going around calling people who disagree with you “Russian bots”?

                No I didn’t, to any of this.

                Ironic prejudice is still prejudice.

                Uh, wow. No prejudice involved.

                I don’t want to argue with you more

                News to me this was an argument as the first contradiction just occurred

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      A child often behaves like an LLM-based bot - a child too often will imitate proper argumentation in style, but say junk, because they want to “win” an argument and not be correct. I would do that when I was a child.

      I mean, adults do that too all the time, so the only way to distinguish bots from people is to communicate with people you know are real or others know are real.

      I love how the old way of using the Web would solve this problem automatically, and P2P solutions with webs of trust too, but the majority of people uses the architecture most advantageous to bots.

      Almost as if you needed bots to attract the majority of people. They wouldn’t come to the web otherwise, for just real people and real communities. It’s like a hunter’s whistle. Or like porn.

    • seahorse [Ohio]@midwest.socialM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      Biden is assisting a genocide though. Will I vote for him in 2024? Most likely. I still fucking hate him though.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        6 months ago

        I mean, that’s fine. I only have a problem with people who will watch the world burn under the guise of principles

        • seahorse [Ohio]@midwest.socialM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          But if biden loses I’m going to blame HIM, not the voters. We all know how dangerous trump is. If biden and other mainstream dems actually believed it they’d be pushing boundaries like never before. But they’re not. They’re actually moving further right to try and appease “centrists” which is pretty much what the social democrats did in Germany in the 30s and we see how well that worked out. They should be promoting the organizing of militias in case trump supporters try to fuck around and seize power again if democracy really is on the line.

    • spacesatan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why am I unsurprised that its lemmy.world libs bringing the ‘everyone I don’t like is a russian bot’ line to the fediverse.

    • Marin_Rider@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      lemmy despite trying not to be like reddit, it’s still moderated by people that get off on the power trip exactly the same

        • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah exactly. What’s weird is my ban was reversed in lemmy.world/c/politics. I have no idea why but I sense weird behind the scenes drama

          They don’t care that much.

    • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      vote biden because trump bad

      what about their resumes? what have either candidates done that has benefited your life enough directly that demands your vote?

      please name one thing biden has done that your life now is better for

      was it the cannabis reforms he promised and flip flopped on with prosecutor harris? was it the police reforms he promised? was it defending our human rights? was it the immigration policies he talked up that now mirror republican strategies? or is that stagnant paycheck after biden promised a higher minimum wage of $15 which is still too low due to the inflation?

      forgot he can not do anything because republicans and republicans never can do anything either because democrats

      through policies and laws crafted and put in place by politicians like biden, trump, obama, and the list goes on my right to vote was taken so not like have a say in this election anyways

      https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/

      https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/?ruling=true

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not that those links would be the metric to go by when voting, but they do not support your position as Biden’s stats are much better there.

        I will not waste any more time on you so don’t bother replying

        • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah. I had to look at both twice to make sure and laughed a bit. Some people can site sources. But they can’t read em

  • Norgur@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    There is a very valid point made there. Think about all the weird arguments you had with other users on the internet over really frustrating stances that made you think "no one can be that dense, or with discussion tactics that were just utterly pointless (constantly shifting goal posts, strawmen, weird pseudo-philosphical ramblings that missed the point completely but ended in some smug “gotcha” that actually was nothing but nonsense). Those tend to leave us in a.bad mood sometimes, right? At least they wanted our mozherfuckin time.

    Now ask yourself: would the impact on your day, the evaluation of what was said and/or your reaction to it have changed, had you known that your opponent is either a literal child or a teenager who just discovered the message behind an Ed Sheeran song and now thinks of themself as some conveyor of deep thoughts?

    I’d bet that around half of all political debates on the internet are useless duels between one person actually arguing something and a child/teenager regurgitating what their dad said and they think they understood but actually didn’t.

    • Null User Object@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      6 months ago

      As a counterpoint, I’ve had in person/face-to-face arguments with people that looked convincingly like typical adult humans that did all of these things.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Same. Intelligent coworkers who still voted for Trump, and still wanted to…

        To be fair, I’m somewhat sure he was straight up a psychopath, though. He wasn’t even nice when you were going out of your way to help him.

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is why I tend not to reply. I make a post and if someone replies with “actually you’re wrong” I just move on with my day. I’ve never seen a reply chain 12 comments deep where the two people arguing come to a reasonable compromise.

      • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I tend to reply more often than is probably good for me not because I care about changing that person’s mind, but instead the others that are reading.

      • TheDeepState@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Welcome to the internet. I don’t see the point of banning someone for a post that no one will ever read again after 12 or so hours.

      • 7u5k3n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo

        • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          6 months ago

          Did you just think that you could fucking fool me with that comment of yours? I’ve searched your name up in the Navy SEAL database and you have never even graduated BUD/S, hell, even served in the Armed Forces. If you were actually a Navy SEAL, then you actually know how to spell guerrilla, you fucking moron. And you say you are the top sniper in the entire US Armed Forces and have over 300 confirmed kills. If that were true, then why the fuck is Chris Kyle a household name and you aren’t? And plus he only had 160 kills. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. Plus why the fuck would you say you have a secret network of spies yet you just revealed that you had your secret network of spies? Are you a fucking idiot? If you can kill someone seven-hundred different ways, then list them all, I bet you can’t even come up with seven. And if you had access to the entire US Marine Corps arsenal, then why the fuck did you just say you were in the Navy SEALs earlier? If only you could have done your research prior to posting your little “clever” comment, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you goddamn idiot.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      ended in some smug “gotcha” that actually was nothing but nonsense

      Recent amusing example, some dingus thought “punching down” was an oxymoron, because not-being-an-asshole toward certain groups meant that group must be superior to you.

      In hindsight I should’ve just called it out as recycled antisemitism.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why is it that despite knowing how utterly futile snarky little debates are, I can’t resist doing it?

      I hate it, but it’s so damn engaging.

      The thing is. It’s never satisfying. Luke no one ever concedes. Ever. They just stop replying eventually.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It is satisfying on the rare occasion someone makes an actually interesting argument you haven’t heard before, or actually addresses your points.

      • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Because it’s a battle of egos and about dominating the conversation. Both of which are vitally important to human life whether other people want to accept it or not.

    • Potatofish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      6 months ago

      Most of the time I purposely torture people with strong feelings on whatever. You know, the ones that know nothing but try to force their opinions by posting, of all places, on Lemmy. Stupid arguments by over zealous humans should be shot down immediately.

  • Beefalo@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Everyone’s being funny about it, but the Dead Internet Theory is looking more and more rational, especially on Reddit. I really don’t have any rational reason to expect that even the dancing TikTok people are real, never mind Reddit comments. I’m fairly certain that I am a living thing, but I have to question everyone else, with all due respect.

    Man, Reddit’s weird now. I think it’s just responding to the cookies that it sets as I use it, but I don’t log in and FF dumps cookies every time I close the browser for the night, so when I browse into r/All there’s a new “hot” subreddit every time, and it’s always kind of random. The usual suspects, like JusticeServed and all that fashy shit, those are kind of conspicuously absent, too.

    I think Reddit’s on their way out, not because of Lemmy, sorry, but because all the normies getting forced online in 2020 was the last hurrah, and the site is on the way down, finally, I can feel the traffic dropping. Everyone’s either getting sucked into the jet engine of TikTok and Instagram or they’re just using group chats and avoiding social media altogether.

    The fascinating thing about modern Reddit is at long last the Americans all seem to have left, and suddenly the site feels like it belongs to the EU, and even South America a bit. So either it’s about to rise with a new flame in this next decade or you should probably buy one share of the IPO as a keepsake and no more. I wonder how long it will take to delist.

    My dude, I’ve spent the last couple years really upgrading my finance chops and now I just keep looking around at the variety of internet based things that seem to be winding down like a shitty old clock while going, hah! interest rates too high now! The current internet was only possible in the free money era.

  • Platform27@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I mean… welcome to the internet. It’s not just Reddit, but most social media, and some “news” sites.

    • Jackcooper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      The problems on Facebook aren’t children. They’re men aged 39-55 wearing sunglasses.

    • Firefly7@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s from The Hard Drive, which is another satire site. The sidebar for this community mentions that other satire sites are okay to post.

      • MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Thanks; I meant the “news” itself, about not longer being able to tell wether the news being satire or not., even though it’s from the Onion or Hard drive

  • GuitarAbuser@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Akshually, Distinguishing between an AI-generated comment and a child’s input can be challenging due to evolving language models. Both may exhibit simplicity, occasional errors, or innocence in expression. As technology progresses, this line blurs, prompting reflection on the nature of communication and the expanding capabilities of AI.

  • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I have a little trick to tell whether im arguing with someone who actually is astroturfin vs someone who’s simply ignorant. I just prick their egos, just a bit. Just a a minor one mind you, not a full throated dismissal. I like to work one into an otherwise on-topic reply.

    Almost always the other person zeroes in on and rises to the bait. If they don’t? Theyre working. Similarly, astroturfers won’t get nasty like real folks do, or double down like real folks do if you debunk their argument well. Astroturfers dont want eyes in that so they’ll simply ghost you.

    Just my hypothesis of course.

    Dunno what to do about figuring their age except tell people mine. Sometimes that gives my words more weight. If my experience is instead dismissed, i always have my 30 years of Internet shit talking under my belt! Insults don’t hit as hard when they’re all re-runs :)

    Edit: anyone want to tell me why they don’t like this? Points don’t matter when it doesn’t hide your comment but I am actually confused. You don’t like it? Think it’s bullshit? I am here for your complaints

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      6 months ago

      Effectively you are dismissing users based on your own feelings and not much else

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        This might be true but it’s the best they I’ve got and it has served me somewhat well (confirmation bias, i know). Beyond my little trick there’s looking into their histories etc but everyone knows that one

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Almost always the other person zeroes in on and rises to the bait.

      That’s a bad method especially on Lemmy which prides itself on friendliness.

      If I know I’m right, and coming down hard on someone in an argument, I actively avoid acknowledging insults because I see it as a tactic to stall from losing an argument.

      People will start ramping up insults before they lose in order to bait you into arguing about the insults instead of the facts that they are wrong about.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I mean, it can pride itself on friendliness, but it’s not really a friendly place. People are toxic and dismissive, often ignoring any nuance in a discussion.

      • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s a bad method especially on Lemmy which prides itself on friendliness.

        I’ve seen a minor increase in people willing to reply and bring actual sauce to discussion. I’ve still never seen anyone willing to change their mind despite mountains of evidence to the contrary. Even when you have a username like my which goads people into ad hominems using fake historical earworms lol.

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        Respectfully, I don’t think lemmy is as friendly as all that. It’s a shit- ton better than Reddit though, (where i developed the method). That aside, there’s also my belief that there aren’t nearly as many astroturfers here (simply because of lemmys limited scope).

        And if what you said is true about avoiding responding to insults, youre kind of a unicorn. Be proud. Most peoples egos are right there on their sleeves, and if youve been around the block you know (at least on that) I’m right.

        People tie their egos to their beliefs. To attack their viewpoint is to attack them personally. People will get frustrated when you blow up an argument. People are easy.

        Now id like to move discussion away from how I’m wrong and my methods bad, and towards other related ideas. Perhaps we might discuss ways to better my method instead of throwing it out (perfect being the enemy of good and all that)? I would also enjoy hearing methods (maybe you have some) of seperating astroturfers from posters.

        Because they exist, and throwing up my hands is unacceptable

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          🤔🤔🤔

          A really good way I have found that doesn’t turn the audience against you like barbecuing souls does is to not speak to whoever you’re replying to at all. Openly say you’re addressing the audience and speak of your opponent in the third person, the way you do when you are talking about someone else right in front of them. Or like, the way you’d show them a new game system you bought, or cookies you made, or something.

          I did that before to an astroturfer on Reddit and the guy never responded back, and I got tons of sweet sweet Reddit karma.

          Do you keep a list of people whom you’ve verified as human, perchance?

          • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            A really good way I have found that doesn’t turn the audience against you like barbecuing souls does is to not speak to whoever you’re replying to at all. Openly say you’re addressing the audience and speak of your opponent in the third person

            I like your idea. I would like to keep people on my side generally since if i think someone is actually astro’n my turf i want other people to chasing them off too, not me. Generally i lose my audience when i mention the possibility they astroturfing even exists, and I’ve always wondered why. I’ll try your method out when i run into a 'turfer im sure about.

            As far as any list, sorry i got nothin. I used to keep a list of suspect astroturfers on Reddit but I’m way too new on lemmy, still finding my way around.

    • emptiestplace@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Your strategy, while innovative, is fundamentally flawed. It’s disingenuous and presumptuous, alienating those who maintain composure and objectivity rather than reacting emotionally to your minor provocations.

      I propose an easier solution: interact with people who you find interesting. Worst case, you have a wonderful conversation with a bot and find your prejudice wasn’t even warranted.

    • Butt Pirate@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Eh. I have 160 replies that I haven’t even looked at. Most of the time I just can’t be bothered to respond to you.

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think I’m probably just gonna end up in the inbox but why would you even comment on a forum if you had no interest in what the other person had to say? In this thread i suppose it’s necessary to say I’m not trying to trick ya, I’m curious! i wonder: what are you getting out of commenting without seeing replies?

        • Butt Pirate@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Most of the time I don’t reply. Sometimes I do though :)

          You know that meme about the people who type up a whole response and then delete it, don’t post it, and move on? That’s unironically me, except now I skip the first three steps. My opinion isn’t worth anything and I (more or less) gave up trying to get people to change their opinions online a long time ago.

          I like seeing what other people have to say on various subjects. I don’t really like sharing, myself.

          • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Hey, thank you for sharing! I thought i was gonna be #161. I think the kind of person who had the self-awareness to say something like “my opinion isn’t worth anything” is the kind of person that i want to see posting more, personally. But i get it. Take it easy :)

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      You think that anyone behaving like an adult after you insult them is a shill? Kee-rist, no wonder the internet is in such bad shape.

      i always have my 30 years of Internet shit talking under my belt! Insults don’t hit as hard when they’re all re-runs :)

      Only 30? If you weren’t online before '93 then you’re a n00b.

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Would you mind explaining what party of my comment made your get angry?

        Did you extrapolate what i said, (i do this with people i suspect) to mean i do this to everyone?

        Was it when i mentioned people’s egos? did i come off as arrogant?

        Im interested now that everyone’s all cooled down in what got everyone all pissed off, cuz again believe it or not that wasn’t the comment’s intent

        What do you say?