• Beryl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Reportedly” ? How hard would it be to verify this claim ? Now that’s some investigative journalism !

  • StarServal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it because female body types in this game are smaller than males but the penis size remains the same, so they only appear larger?

  • Madbrad200@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s genuinely hilarious that I wasn’t sure if this was a real headline or not. It really does seem like the type of shit they’d write

    • Piecemakers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair, there are only two female genital options in BG3. Both called “vulva”, and the only difference is one has public hair while the other does not. If it were even remotely “woke”, not only would the options be more than “innies”, but they’d be more representative of realistic variance. /my2¢

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I honestly wish game devs would put their effort somewhere else. I hardly ever see my character naked. Having genital options just feels like a sales gimmick for teenagers

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    DailyMail get don’t mad about optional shit in a video game challenge (IMPOSSIBLE). Seriously, I turned the nudity off. Its one of the first things it asks you about.