Regardless of if it’s practical to live that way in daily life, the world seems pretty determined. Everything happens because a vast amount of interactions between infinite factors causes it to. You can’t really say you choose between things as many influences have been taken in by you and many things have affected your psychological state. Has everything been practically decided by the big bang? Now, this is not to say we can know everything or predict the future, but we know what’s likely. Socialism or extinction may be inevitable, but we don’t know yet. Socialism can only happen if people keep fighting, regardless. People will be convinced or principled or not. Science seems to agree with this, and only few, like the wrong Sartre would propose we have ultimate free will. So are there any arguments against determinism? I know there is a saying that you’re freer when you recognize how your freedom is restricted, and that recognition may make your actions better, but isn’t there ultimately no freedom?

  • 中国共产党万岁@lemmygrad.ml
    5·
    10 months ago

    Based on the data listed above, it can be concluded that the observed phenomenon of intercellular neuronal interconnection using Arc has developed in evolution as a reflection of the adaptive value of the TE transcript transfer phenomenon between postmitotic cells. It is possible that when neurons exchange virus-like mRNA particles between neurons, the ability of TEs to be integrated in a site-specific manner (Sultana et al., 2017) with a change in the expression of neuron-specific genes is used to form long-term memory. As a result, the functioning of neurons and the storage of information in the brain change (Bachiller et al., 2017). from here