• KevonLooney@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    social contract noun

    A usually implicit agreement among the members of an organized society or between the governed and the government defining and limiting the rights and duties of each. 
    
      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Laws are explicit, not implicit. You said you didn’t understand what a social contract was and I answered you. Now you’re just being intentionally obtuse.

        • 𝕯𝖎𝖕𝖘𝖍𝖎𝖙@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          I never said anything of the sort. I said I didn’t understand the wording of the social contract. Please just link this one contract to me, since everyone’s always discussing it.

          I can’t have a conversation unless I know the topic.

          Topic like “agreement” is bit too vauge but hey, I’ll try: “Isn’t it great when everyone? I know, right?!”

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            You have all the tools you need at your disposal. At this point, you are the biggest obstacle to your success.

            • 𝕯𝖎𝖕𝖘𝖍𝖎𝖙@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              And what benefit will me understanding the precursor to “agreements” grant me?

              Folks keep thinking I don’t understand what a social contract is.

              I don’t understand why such an old term is relevant when it can’t even be defined and is different for each person. The best we can come up with is something like “well, you do the things society wants and you get treated well”. Which one person will interpret as “I give food to the homeless, because they need food” and another person will interpret as “I don’t give food to the homeless because they need to understand the grind, they need to feel the hunger, it will motivate them to do better”. Both people obey “the social contract” yet, both are participating in opposite actions.

              “The social contract” sounds a lot like “don’t be a dick” which, while nice sounding on the surface really needs clarification and this is why we have written contracts, governments, law, etc.

              Sure, this wasn’t the case prior to law, but we have law now so…