You’re being facetious: How do you expect underpaid, overworked farmers to turn a profit and provide for their families if you’re making them grow a bunch of dirt cheap rice?
There is no other way to interpret this comment other than demanding the farmer(s) sell the product of their choice at the market, favoring the individual over the collective here.
China and America have the exact same (2.5%) hunger rate using the same source.
Because the PRC is still a developing country, and their hunter rate was much worse in the past, that means (pretending your lies and misdirection are real) they are improving to close the gap and ensure food security.
Again, all of your posts boil down to:
: NOOO YOU HAVE TO HATE CHINA!! SEESEEPEE BOTS NOOOO!! STOP GIVING ME COUNTERARGUMENTS!! NOOO!! HATE CHINA WITH ME!! NO!!!
There is no other way to interpret this comment other than demanding the farmer(s) sell the product of their choice at the market, favoring the individual over the collective here.
The government could make them grow green rice but give them extra money to make up for it. Farmers deserve fair pay. Of course, the millionaires and billionaires of the CCP wouldn’t want that.
In a country where the Communist Party makes all the big decisions, Chinese lawmakers hold very little political power . But they have plenty of money — $650 billion of it — and that’s growing.
Delegates to Parliament, or the National People’s Congress, rubber-stamp most of the policies set out by the party’s leadership
(own emphasis added)
The NPC includes elements from all parts of China, including the National Bourgeoisie. So which is it? Do the billionaires hold the power, or does the Party?
I agree. I checked your username and saw you’re the same fuckwit from the previous thread, so I’m stepping out.
Edit: I should also note that I do believe China to be a socialist state, or at the very least, a state earnestly and effectively working towards resolving its internal contradictions, including unfair wealth distribution, as part of its stated goal of becoming a ‘modern socialist’ state by 2049.
You’re being facetious: How do you expect underpaid, overworked farmers to turn a profit and provide for their families if you’re making them grow a bunch of dirt cheap rice?
There is no other way to interpret this comment other than demanding the farmer(s) sell the product of their choice at the market, favoring the individual over the collective here.
Because the PRC is still a developing country, and their hunter rate was much worse in the past, that means (pretending your lies and misdirection are real) they are improving to close the gap and ensure food security.
Again, all of your posts boil down to:
The government could make them grow green rice but give them extra money to make up for it. Farmers deserve fair pay. Of course, the millionaires and billionaires of the CCP wouldn’t want that.
Source?
Archive version of source
https://web.archive.org/web/20230815053539/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/01/business/china-parliament-billionaires.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/01/business/china-parliament-billionaires.html
(own emphasis added)
The NPC includes elements from all parts of China, including the National Bourgeoisie. So which is it? Do the billionaires hold the power, or does the Party?
Oops I assumed the CCP and parliament were the same thing. Anyways:
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1746362/china-latest-communist-party-billionaires-spt
deleted by creator
41 billionaires in government is 41 too many for a “”““socialist””“” state idiot.
I agree. I checked your username and saw you’re the same fuckwit from the previous thread, so I’m stepping out.
Edit: I should also note that I do believe China to be a socialist state, or at the very least, a state earnestly and effectively working towards resolving its internal contradictions, including unfair wealth distribution, as part of its stated goal of becoming a ‘modern socialist’ state by 2049.
2nd edit - clarity and grammar
Don’t call people idiots, that’s very rude and Bernie would be angry at you.
No, like the implication that the government wont subsidizing or give benefits to the farmers who grow green rice. Because it sounds made up tbh