• waigl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Okay, then I suppose the game is not suitable for eight year olds. That’s fine, I play a lot of games that are not suitable for eight year olds.

    • nieceandtows@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah like I said in another comment, the game is not a kids game, and that is fine. However, the game looks cute and charming, and very like pokemon, which makes it very attractive for kids, and makes me concerned for any kid who likes playing this game.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The concern over children liking Palworld is akin to all those unfounded concerns about shooter games “causing” violence.

        Humans, even small children, are VERY capable to separate fiction from reality. There’s no problem at all about a kid wanting to play a game about catching animals and using them to build your base.

        • nieceandtows@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          That might actually be true up to a certain age. She was really into Powerpuff girls when she was 5, and I had to switch it to something else because she was aggressive a lot. It was like a switch turned off a week after I stopped ppg. Anecdotal, but yeah some things are not suitable for some ages.

      • waigl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not entirely a dismissable concern, admittedly, but also not relevant for me for deciding whether or not I should give that game a try.