• ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Other services exist to achieve those things so it’s not necessary for them to do it

    • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not necessary, no but it adds value to it’s users and thus making their platform the most popular.

      Like Epic’s launcher is the perfect comparison for this: It has the bare minimum features available to sell games and people hate it for it’s lack of features. It’s not necessary for Epic to add those features but clearly people value those in their choice of platform.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Which they shouldn’t have the option of

        It’s like saying Amazon and Walmart are better than a local shop because they offer more/are cheaper

        They shouldn’t be allowed to compete at that size

        • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          The reason why Amazon is bad is because they undercut their competition to drive them out of business just to then raise prices and create a monopoly. What is happening with Steam and other launchers is the other ones are refusing to compete on features and instead are trying to create monopolies with exclusive games so people would be forced to use an inferior product.

          Creating a limitation that X features aren’t allowed to exist on a gaming client would solve no issues here as Steam isn’t even trying to create a monopoly, they just have the best product currently and everyone is free to out compete them.