I don’t think many people understand that if they use Lemmy or kbin, they are posting to the fediverse. There are other platforms and will be more to come. Referring to a post on “Lemmy” or “kbin” is like saying you saw a post on your Windows or Mac computer.

We should be referring to it as…

  • I saw it on the fediverse.
  • Hey fediverse users
  • A thread on the fediverse

New terms may emerge but referring to the platform seems weird, almost ignorant.

edit: A better example is email. You wouldn’t assume everyone is on Hotmail because that is the email provider you use. You say I’m sendingan eamail, not I’m sending a Hotmail.

  • Xiphorang@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    While you’re correct, it’s just a clunky term. I think some other way to refer to the whole thing will probably come along soon, and in a few years, people will regard saying fediverse the same way we look back on people talking about “surfing the information superhighway” or whatever.

    • bvanevery@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dang I totally forgot all about that term. Been awhile. Well it eventually reduced to “surfing the net”.

      The thing about the internet, is it was the thing to make it only one net. Previously there were weird systems like bitnet, VMSnet, where you had to juggle email address encoding standards to get balkanized college campus networks to talk back and forth to each other.

      “The web” became the subset of the net, that worked with web browsers. Only one thing.

      Was there a “The Facebook” period? Or was that just a movie name?

      So then we passed through a period of brands. Reddit is a brand. It is not altogether surprising that people would refer to the fediverse in terms of brands. Lemmy, kbin, beehaw, whatever.

      Email and the web had/have specific protocols associated with them. The fediverse has multiple protocols. We’re using ActivityPub, which seems to have won as a standard. It isn’t exactly catchy or smooth flowing off the tongue.

      Ok, if we try to brain crunch all these previous trends, here’s what it’s going to be called, if it hasn’t been already:

      THE VERSE

      The difference between the fediverse and the universe will be forgotten. Linguistically, people will not keep up with that detail. Only old timers / early adopters will notice that linguistic change.

      Possibly, ‘verse’ will come to be seen as short for multiverse.

    • Cat@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Definitely a clunky term. It will be interesting to see what the feds come up with. Lets see if that catches on :-D

      Seriously, I’m sure something good will emerge.

      • Kichae@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not convinced that something good will emerge.

        Keep in mind we still use “internet”.

        • Xiphorang@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, but we used to call it the information superhighway and the worldwide web. Internet IS the good term. It may well be that fediverse sticks around so long that we all get used to it, but at the moment, eh. I think if someone somewhere suggests a good alternative, we’ll all likely jump on it.

        • Boz (he/him)@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Internet” is closer to a lot of existing English words than “fediverse,” though. “Fediverse” might get familiar over time, and it might make more sense to non-English-speakers, but I think it’s a more exotic construction than “internet.”

    • sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would love it if we just went all early 1990s and started saying “hello Internet!” or something beautifully corny like that.

      In the end activitypub is a standard recognized by the W3C, so it would be kind of accurate.

  • Walt J. Rimmer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s more like saying, “I saw this on my phone,” or, “I was on the computer and read,” which are both entirely reasonable.

    It’s just stating what format you were using when you saw it. Like, “I was scrolling through Google News and read…” What you actually read was an article hosted on a different website, but you were using the platform of Google News to read it. It’s the same kind of thing as saying, “I read on Lemmy,” because you were browsing Lemmy when you read something.

    It’s not wrong to say that these things are on this site. I often specify Lemmy.World because that’s the instance that I use and other Fediverse sites function slightly differently. That’s one of the both great and annoying things about the Fediverse is how every instance is slightly different. I’ll say, “I was on Lemmy.World and…” I don’t know, saw a post, made a post, had trouble because mod controls are minimal over here, whatever. Saying, “On the Fediverse,” is more generic. It’s usually considered best convention to go with more SPECIFIC terms than generic. I consider using my Mastadon account and using my Lemmy account to be different, but they’re both on the Fediverse. I would feel really weird talking about my Mastadon account in the same terms as my Lemmy.World one since I use the two platforms completely differently.

    • Silverseren@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      But you are posting on a Kbin thread right now, not a Lemmy thread. So you’re not “on Lemmy World” when you’re viewing this thread.

      • Walt J. Rimmer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. I am on Lemmy.World right now viewing a KBin thread. My entire interaction here is through Lemmy.World and not KBin. So for me to say, “I was on KBin arguing with someone,” would be factually incorrect because I am not on KBin. It would be factually correct to say, “I was on the Fediverse arguing with someone,” but since the Fediverse has different forms, that interaction itself could take several forms and context does sometimes matter. There’s nothing wrong with the more generic The Fediverse, but there’s also nothing wrong with stating which instance you’re using to be more specific.

        • bvanevery@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You had an argument on the 'verse.

          The apostrophe is gonna get dropped eventually. Same as it did for 'net meaning internet.

          I doubt fedi~ will be remembered after awhile. It’ll be seen as pedantic, technical, or old school.

          I don’t know if people are generally sci-fi enough to think of you as on “planet Lemmy” but it would have a bit of snark like saying you’re on planet Mars. Could be a good subculture lingo.

          “I am Clark Kent from the planet Kbin!”

          “Yeah and I’m Flash Gordon STFU.”

        • Silverseren@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          But the person you were arguing with wasn’t arguing with you on Lemmy.world, so that’s misleading on where the argument was taking place.

          If someone took you at your word and looked on Lemmy.world in specific, they would not be able to find the argument in question, because it was taking place in a Kbin.social thread.

          • bvanevery@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The battlecruisers were out arguing in neutral space, in the verse.

            The cruisers’ home ports were planet Lemmy and planet Kbin.

            Unfortunately half the galaxy was destroyed in the ensuing exchange.

        • fishos@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re missing the point. If I email you, are we talking ON Gmail? ON Hotmail? Not really. We’re using our different clients to interact with the same original message. Sure, the message gets converted to your emails specific formatting, but it’s just a copy of the original info. The message itself is the conversation, the clients are just access to it.

          You wouldn’t say “I drove my Honda to the store”. You’d say “I drove my car”.

          Nobody said “I’m browsing Apollo/Sync/RIF”. You’d say “I’m browsing Reddit” or “fuck spez”.

          You’re one step from being the mom that calls every video game system a “Nintendo”.

          • bvanevery@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            are we talking ON Gmail?

            Sometimes. People meeting in real life, exchanging email addresses, and noticing they’re both on GMail, is common enough for some people, they really are on GMail. Implying they could chat trivially. But that’s not applicable to the scenario under discussion.

            Actually you’d just say you drove to the store. We don’t really care if you own a car, a truck, and a SUV in your driveway. We don’t expect you to have a horse and buggy.

      • PupBiru@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s more correct to say they’re on lemmy than kbin though… they are interacting through lemmy: kbin is literally irrelevant to them

        … and that’s kinda the point of the fediverse isn’t it? you shouldn’t care where something is stored, and if you don’t care where it’s stored then you have only 1 way to refer to the space: the client by which you’re viewing it

        people referring to it as “lemmy” or “kbin” or “mastodon” is the fediverse working as intended, and that’s good news!

        (it’s also much better marketing for us! people search fediverse and they get a bunch of random descriptions about what it is… people search lemmy/kbin and at least they have a join button)

        • Silverseren@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mastodon is at least something of a more generalized term at least, because that’s referring to hundreds of instances. And it has a specific (Twitter-esque) format that unites them. But Lemmy and Kbin has the same formatting structure (Reddit-esque). Makes me wonder if we need a specific, but generalized term that unites everything in this format.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “fediverse” isn’t correct either - it’s too broad. Kbin and Lemmy post to a part of the fediverse - the “threadiverse”. Meanwhile job in can also post to the microblogverse connecting with Mastodon. And there is not one fediverse - ir is both separated by different algorithms for different bits and also within areas some bits federate with others.

    If you want a good term for the threadiverse, then Feddit seems like a good catch all name?

  • NaN@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve been missing this grandiose caliber of post since leaving Reddit, truly bravo.

    - Posted to Lemmy

    • Silverseren@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You didn’t actually. You posted to Kbin. Because this thread is on Kbin, even if you’re reading it on Lemmy. Which is kind of OP’s point.

      • NaN@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I did, actually. My instance has a saved copy of the post, I replied to it there, it forwarded the information to Kbin.

        OPs point is dumb. Lemmy and Kbin are separate platforms that happen to be interoperable because of the backend protocol they’ve decided to use (which Kbin added relatively recently in the grand scheme). The Fediverse is made up of many of these platforms that are doing the same thing. There is nothing wrong with referring to the platform one is using.

        • CheshireSnake@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well said. If you want to mean all the things connected to ActivityPub, you say Fediverse. If it’s restricted to lemmy, it’s fine to use lemmy. Absolutely nothing wrong with that. OP saying it borders on ignorance may have to think about it.

          I use lemmy. I don’t really care for nor use other Fediverse services like Mastodon.

  • Wooly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not referencing the fediverse, it’s stupid. But also, lemmy isn’t a great name so I probably just won’t mention anything like that.

    • bvanevery@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “The Fediverse is stupid.”
      “The Fediverse is stupid.”
      Negativeland said Christianity is stupid.
      Christianity is stupid.
      Communism is good!
      [then a lot of chanting and noisemaking]

  • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Personally I think “fediverse” is a stupid fucking name. I’m tired of “-verses”. I’ll keep saying kbin, thanks.

  • richard_wagner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is going to reveal my ignorance:

    How does the federation work from a high level? On Reddit, data is stored and managed by Reddit.

    How about the fediverse? If the data isn’t centrally located, what is stopping some data from just being lost at any time? Who owns the servers?

    If the servers are owned by anyone who wants to own a server, I assume there will still be popular servers that get the most traffic. And if those servers have high traffic, how will they sustain that model? How do they “keep the lights on” without ads?

    Thanks for helping me understand.

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My understanding is that most instances are currently being either self-funded (sort of as passion projects), or accepting donations to cover hosting/maintenance costs.

      Buy your local admin a coffee!

    • bvanevery@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How does the federation work from a high level?

      Well, Captain Kirk goes out on the flagship and kicks some serious alien ass. Contrary to popular belief, he doesn’t usually screw it, but he is almost contractually obligated to have his shirt torn. Spock bails him out with derisions of Something Something Diplomacy, I forget exactly what. And that’s how the federation works. At a high level.

      At a really high level, they all get zapped by plant spores and turn into hippies.

    • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      https://lemmy.world/comment/20357

      This comment was very helpful when I first joined. Long story short, each server is locally storing data for its own users and communities, and also for external communities that at least one user is subscribed to.

      Everything is either self or donor funded, and it is my understanding that this model can scale quite a bit without a crazy amount of donations.

      But if we get into instances with over a million users, I’m not sure when/if the donor funded model eventually breaks down. That’ll be a good problem to have though, because it means this platform will have been a massive success.

      • bvanevery@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’ll be a good problem to have though, because it means this platform will have been a massive success.

        I dunno, could be a repeat of Eternal September.

  • Annoyed_Crabby@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dude, fediverse is the whole system linking everything together and lemmy/kbin/mastodon is the platform within it. So refer it as fediverse IS saying you saw a post from the internet.

    • bvanevery@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder how much sleep early network people lost about communicating through the ether. Or late 19th century physicists for that matter.

  • Mr_Will@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I was browsing Reddit and saw an interesting video, I might tell someone “I saw an interesting video on Reddit the other day” even if the video itself was hosted on YouTube. The technical detail of exactly where and how the video is hosted is not relevant to the conversation. The listener wants to know how I found it, not where it is stored.

    The same is true for posts on the fediverse. The various instances are the websites that we browse. The technical detail of how they share content and how it can be accessed from various different routes just isn’t important most of the time. If you’re a Lemmy user, you’re reading the posts on Lemmy and there is nothing wrong with talking about it that way.

    If I tell someone I bought a game on Steam or borrowed a book from the library, the fact that they are also available elsewhere doesn’t matter. If I tell someone I read something on kbin, does it matter that the same post also exists on different websites? 99% of the time, the answer is ‘no’.

    New terms may emerge but referring to the platform seems weird, almost ignorant.

    I agree, but you’ve got it upsidedown. The fediverse is the platform that the instances operate on, not vice-versa.

  • Teon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I personally like to call it “Fedi”. I was reading a post / thread on Fedi and it said…
    If someone asked where exactly it was I would mention the platform.
    And in my opinion, everyone should be mentioning the name of the platform they are on. Because when you mention what software or server you used, it promotes it to non Fediverse people. And it also tells current Fediverse users about other Fedi platforms that they may like, and didn’t know about.
    That’s how I found Misskey, and it’s quite cool.
    So many options to explore, and try out interfaces that may work better for you.

    We are all on the Fediverse, we all should be promoting that in any way we can.
    Share, educate and take pride in our diverse community.

    • Nepenthe@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just consistently mention it because it’s a huge topic atm and it’s to everyone’s benefit to clarify. If I’m over here talking about how I’m SO glad I can mute instances willy-nilly as I please but don’t mention I’m doing that from kbin, that’s going to send a lot of frustrated lemmings scrambling through their settings.

      Generic is “(the) fedi/fediverse.” But where I’m specifically from may carry connotations in UI or culture for those here, and those not here would maybe prefer a platform name they can actually look up, as has already happened to me once.

      I do think the “Blaaah, we got X amount of users and we’re the biggest in the fedi!” posts are borderline odd, because yeah, we’re not going head to head anymore. The tribalism we’ve had drilled into us for decades, we have no need of now and I don’t wanna see any of the platform politics that’s always been in the past. Thankfully, it seems to be stemming from genuine enjoyment instead of elitist gloating, and it keeps itself to a minimum.

      • Teon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, the tribalism needs to go away and we need to think more along the lines of the “neighborhood” we are in. All the Fedis are our neighbors.

        • bvanevery@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I dunno, the Ferengis are neighbors and they’re damn greedy.

          The Centauris I hear are pretty nice.

    • Nepenthe@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think just Lemmy, kbin, mastodon, etc. naturally implies the platform-specific -verse, doesn’t it? I think “Hey, Lemmy–” posts addressing the entire fediverse are being accidentally myopic, but “Hey, Lemmy [users]” would be understandable, given a need to discuss our UI differences. The former is fairly common atm, though, which I admit is faintly annoying to see on my kbin feed. I feel so left out.

      • bvanevery@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Hey, Soviet SSR! In Russia you don’t federate. Federation does you!”

        Didn’t mean to be so accurate…