• rookeh@geddit.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I feel like whatever point Steve is trying to make here could have been a community post or even a short rather than what looks like a 45 minute hit piece on his competitor.

    This appears (from the thumbnail and first few minutes of content) to be drama for the sake of drama. If anyone can summarise to the contrary, please do.

    • riesendulli@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      He is showing in video statements and fails done by LTT. There is nothing to water down to people like you. It’s either full data or you will misrepresent what was stated

      • rookeh@geddit.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yeah, I just finished watching it. I stand corrected - first impressions aside, Steve raises some important concerns.

        I’m also impressed that he voluntarily de-monetized his own video, it goes a long way to highlighting the principles behind it. Not many content creators literally put their money where their mouth is like that.

        I will be interested to see how LMG responds to this.

    • Untangled1426@mas.to
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      @rookeh @Dubious_Fart

      No. Being sponsored by products you review, auctioning off prototypes of reviewed products despite agreeing to giving it back, wrong and erroneous data - just some of the problems outlined in the video.

      But the most funny thing is that GN foresaw comments like yours happening - the community will just scream and defend LTT - without realising how bad you are for other consumers. Congrats!