• gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    In-n-Out has famously “bad” fries for 2 reasons:

    • they single fry, not double fry. This is the classic way fries are fried and actually the big innovation that made McDonalds fries so famously good. Double frying results in a crispier and better tasting fry at the cost it being worse for you. Also let’s them transport them easier en masse

    • they go light as fuck on the salt (some locations I’ve been to didn’t salt at ALL though that may have been a mistake during a rush), to the point they provide salt packets to salt your own fries, which many people don’t do.

    I think they might also fry theirs in peanut oil like 5GBAF do, but I’m uncertain on that front.

    Personally I think their fries are some of the better ones but you gotta salt em

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      double fry

      I worked McDonald’s when I was 16 (37-years ago 😢) and we didn’t do that.

      Worked a famous bar-and-grill in college and they taught us that, but we called it “blanching”. You could damn near serve hour-old fries, still crispy.

      Is blanching the wrong term?

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        They’re fried before they’re packaged and sent to the franchises who do the actual end frying

        Blanching is the same as frying but instead of an oil you use water and then also sink or rinse it in cold water to quickly halt the cooking. Doing that with fries would ruin them, but I don’t think it’s wrong enough if a term to care. If someone knows what blanching is and you say you did it to your fries with oil they’ll get what you mean