• Fjaeger@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, I couldn’t watch past Yvonne’s section, it just felt like a corporate ad tbh.

    • Freeman@lemmy.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was just thinking about how theres almost no gradient between what makes you a “quirky and fun small business” which they want to act like and “oh shit better put on our IBM corporate hats and make another video”

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      People buying this haven’t worked for a mid to large sized company. This is internal corporate coolaid bullshit. Nothing ever comes from this lip service. It’s just cringe

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep. Some executive sent out an order that they have to make some sort of response. This was done to appease them, not the public.

      • QHC@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sometimes things do change for the better, but usually not with the same people in the same positions.

    • NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Personally felt it was the right thing, and earned some respect back from me. They need to address Madison’s accusations separately (which are damning), but they certainly had positive movement with the points raised by the community / GN.

      Each of the department heads outlined their shortcomings and how they were being addressed. It felt genuine and sincere, and certainly not the generic bullshit you usually get from a corporate PR team on damage control. I hope they follow through enacting those plans, and it has a positive impact to both their quality and working environments.

      The only bit I hated was Linus’ section (and this is meant to be a criticism, not a personal attack).

      He opened up with a joke that Luke will have a lot to do curbing his (Linus) own behaviour, had a brief moment of sincerity, but went back to immediately defending himself and their actions. He didn’t fully acknowledge what his “emotional” response actually did, nor a personal response/apology to both GN/Billet Labs for it. There was no real acknowledgment he will address his own shortcomings. It honestly felt like someone who acknowledges he’s wrong (purely based on number of internal members telling him he’s in the wrong), but doesn’t agree nor accept it.

      • QHC@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Linus should not have appeared in this video at all. It would have shown that adults are now in charge and that someone can actually tell him “no”.

      • stowaway8745@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean the monetizing of the video was in pretty poor taste. They plugged they’re merchandise multiple times. They joked about the video being sponsored twice. All of which screams, we don’t care about what we did just don’t take away our money.

        The video was still then being defensive.

        They never apologized to GN or Hardware Unboxed.

        Sex jokes too enlight of sexual harassment and employee mistreatment claims.

        They rushed the video out too, it’s a culmination of most of the things wrong with lmg. If they had taken their time with this and taken it seriously I would have probably given them points and been very surprised, but this was absolutely bs pr. Totally unapologetic and insincere. Even if they do change anything I don’t believe it’s because they want it, itll be because they’ll be out $$$.

        They also need to reconsider they’re hr, pretty significant conflict of interest there… then again hr isn’t there for employees protection anyway…