• andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    actual substantive difference between the 2.

    One party wants to deny me access to healthcare: they want to make it illegal for me to continue taking the testosterone I have taken for almost a decade. They would force me to carry a pregnancy to term, even if it was deformed and could kill me. They are making it illegal for teachers to even refer to a kid by the name they prefer. They are attacking things like free school lunches and even the department of education itself. Their figurehead has repeatedly flouted the rule of law and has told us loud and clear that he would like to be a dictator.

    Yeah, Dems fucking suck. The ACA was garbage, the Clinton’s crime bill was garbage. The Democratic Party fucks over actual leftists all the time.

    But there is most certainly a substantive difference between the 2.

    • Melkath@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      But there is most certainly a substantive difference between the 2.

      Yes, that diminishes with each passing year. Like I said.

      • naught@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        If the common sentiment that we’re more divided than ever is accurate, how could this possibly be true? Wouldn’t the differences grow? Can you name policy positions that are identical between parties? If I look at healthcare, taxation, infrastructure, education, foreign policy, welfare, business regulation, environmental policy, social issues etc. it is pretty clear cut to me. How do you justify your both-side-ism?