• frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    I went to a panel on the problems with the Prime Directive at Chicon 8. There was a lawyer there who actually works with international aid organizations on how they intervene. His biggest problem with the Prime Directive is that it’s too simple. They have stacks of rules about how exactly they go about this. There are places where they’re not allowed to go because somebody fucked this up bad at some point in the past, and those people don’t owe them access just because they promise to be better now.

    IIRC, there is a throwaway line somewhere (from Data, I think) that says the Prime Directive is followed up by a hundred little rules defining out the specifics, but it’s never treated that way.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve also seen interesting arguments on wether the prime directive is even moral at all, after all if space fairing civilisations are encountering you then they’re probably going to imminently scoop up all the good interstellar real estate in your viscinity, not enlightening a civilisation is dooming them to be stuck with whatever resources are left when every other civilisation nearby has taken what it wants. (Lets be realistic there’s no way every single group is going to abide by a treaty that grants primitive civilisations pre-emptive territory bubbles)