Several Republican representatives have proposed amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act to try to stop the Pentagon’s electrification. The proposals sound so mind-bogglingly dumb that they look like they were written by 19th-century Luddites or the fossil fuel industry itself.

With the US military operating a fleet of hundreds of thousands of vehicles, including tactical vehicles, it makes the Pentagon the largest institutional consumer of fossil fuels in the world.

The entire transportation industry is currently transitioning to electric propulsion, and the US military knows better than to be left behind.

  • DarkGamer@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Agreed. Also, electric vehicles are also much simpler mechanically speaking. They have fewer moving parts that can break relative to a modern gas engine. In-wheel electric motors wouldn’t need a drive train, and would mean more room for other military stuff in vehicles.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fueling is also much less volatile and you can gain that electricity with cleaner means and cheaper fuels, ideally nuclear.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If they had to do an emergency airlift supply drop, I wonder if they’d prefer dropping a massive battery vs a pile of gasoline. Although the battery would be more expensive I guess. Like airdrop a Tesla Megapack.

        Also that’d be bad if a enemy overran them and then took that asset, so probably bad idea heh