The European Commission says China hasn’t been playing fair in that its government has been paying subsidies through “direct transfer of funds,” among other actions, reports Reuters – which the EC says tips the balance in China’s favor and leaves European automakers out to dry.

Back in October 2023, Europe launched its formal investigation into the Chinese EV industry, as European companies are struggling to compete with the cheap, high-tech Chinese imports, made by low-cost labor, entering the European Union.

  • spacedout@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Sorry, haven’t almost all our European industries relied heavily on government subsidies, privatization of previously public entities, protectionism and so on? China is a socialist country, of course the government is subsidizing production. The reality is that China is outcompeting capitalist Europe (now sacrificed by the US) on capitalist terms. This move seems like an abandonment of free market laissez faire thinking in favour of mercantilism/outright iron curtain, while blaming it on the other guy.

      • spacedout@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well, yeah, it’s complicated and all that, but still. For instance, did you know Huawei is a cooperative? I just learned.

        • 0x815@feddit.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          @spacedout

          Well, yeah, it’s complicated and all that, but still. For instance, did you know Huawei is a cooperative? I just learned.

          Everything depends on the central government in China, whether it is a cooperative, a listed company, or a single person critical of the CCP. In tbe end, nothing happens without a highly centralized government.

          • spacedout@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I think it’s hard to tell and would advise against bombastic blanket statements like this, especially on China. We’re talking about one billion people and the world’s largest economy, after all. Our ability to clearly analyze China is hindered by its own opaqueness, but one should not forget the thick layer of propaganda we in the West are served whenever we’re talking about one of the so-called strategic adversaries.

            • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              the world’s largest economy

              Incorrect. It is the second or third largest, behind the USA and the EU, depending on whether you count the EU as one economic entity.

            • 0x815@feddit.deOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I posted a link above, there’s enough information available and certainly more than one can post here. In a nutshell: nothing good ever comes from an authoritarian regime.

              • spacedout@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                There you go again making blanket statements, giving you a look of either being a little daft and unnuanced or some kind of propagandist. “Nothing good”, unless you count biggest lift of people from poverty in history. Imagine two people being born in the sixties in India and China respectively. Both are dirt poor back then. Today one will still be poor, still in a third world country, while the other drives EVs, get their power from worlds largest green energy infrastructure, has working public services, best train system, etc.

                • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Imagine two people being born in the sixties in India and China respectively.

                  I will happily imagine. Will you?

                  China: 55 million dead.

                  India: not.

                  Please note that the 55 million estimate is from a CCP party school official, not from a western historian - thus we can safely conclude that the number may well be higher.

                  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine

                  And I say this as someone as far left as left goes. We must not be blind to the crimes that have been committed, and are being committed, by terrible dictatorships that hide behind the ideas of Marx.

                  China is a state capitalist dictatorship engaged in genocide as we speak. Whether or not they have the audacity to call themselves socialist, or even communist, does not change their crimes.

                  • spacedout@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    And I say this as someone as far left as left goes.

                    This is much like beginning a comment with “I’m not racist, but”, with the inevitable horrible racism that follows. Your comment is such a gross simplification of history and dismissal of context, that it borders on the malign. For instance the number in your source says 15-55 million, not 55 million. The ideological broadside is very apparent. Facts not feelings, to paraphrase a broken clock.

                    1. Yes, China had a terrible famine in the 60s, but far left people tend to consider it in context China’s historical famines, as well as the many millions dead to capitalist induced famine.
                    2. Leftists tend to consider deaths and consequences of capitalist imperialism when discussing foreign and developing nations.
                    3. Today India is listed as a country in “Serious” risk in the Global Hunger Index, while China is of course “Low”.

                    These are just three aspects of context, of many, which you could have chosen to inform your comment. In stead it is perpetuating a US-vs-Them cold war, black and white rhetoric, making the West out to be exceptionally good, while China is entirely bad. Smart people smell the lies included in such oversimplification a long way. You run fast and loose with your facts, presenting allegations of Uyghur genocide as fact, while you probably know how the UN will not call it that, after long running and thorough investigations, a lack of evidence, etc. On the other hand, we in Europe are very much facilitating the ongoing genocide in Palestine, of which there is ample coverage.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sorry, haven’t almost all our European industries relied heavily on government subsidies

      Yes, and that stuff is factored in on every trade agreement the EU signs. The Chinese subsidies were not so now they are making the adjustments.

      • spacedout@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Trade agreements inside the European single market? What are you on about, buddy? Seems like lazy apologetics. Of course there are state aid rules in the EU, but the fact of the matter is that everyone from Hugo Boss to Seat and Nokia has been on the receiving end of favorable conditions from their home countries (Nazi uniform contracts in Boss’ case). Hell, even the American giants like Microsoft and Apple are propped up on government contracts.

    • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      A lot of EU products with national subsidies are usually only available at a cheaper price to occupants in that country. I know it works that way for french car brands.

      • spacedout@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Honestly, when it comes to helping their national companies get ahead in the global market, European countries aren’t that different from anywhere else. It’s like a global game where everyone’s trying to sneak their products into the lead with a little help from home. Think of it as governments giving their players the best gear, secret strategies, and even a map of shortcuts. Whether it’s subsidies, regulatory loopholes, or strategic support, the end goal is the same: make sure our team wins, even if it means bending the rules of fair play. So next time you see a European car or product leading the pack, remember, it might have had a little “help” getting there.