No there shouldn’t, it would be an absolute shit show as to who decides what’s on the test and what the correct answers are.
The best is mandatory voting, making voting day a national holiday, and universal mail-in voting. The problem is people thinking their voice doesn’t matter because of gerrymandering, the electoral college, and 2 senators per state.
Then we may as well restrict impoverished groups of people who can’t get a good enough education from voting. Since they don’t vote, we should just pull even move funding from them. We should also make them work for their basic sustenances since they can’t contribute anything else. Let’s even quarantine them to certain areas to make sure they don’t put too much strain on our society. Without them having a voice, only working for basic necessities, and being confined, we should just call them slaves.
It’s illustrating the point of why restricting certain groups of people from voting is very ill-advised. It may seem like an extreme example, but it can get the point across.
It pretty much says that when you start to remove voting rights from some people based on something that may be out of their hands, it can open that system up to be abused. Just like what the US experienced with women and blacks. (We remember the Suffrage and Civil Rights Movements, right?)
Consider that that half is voting now. There really should be a free basic civics test to allow voting.
No there shouldn’t, it would be an absolute shit show as to who decides what’s on the test and what the correct answers are.
The best is mandatory voting, making voting day a national holiday, and universal mail-in voting. The problem is people thinking their voice doesn’t matter because of gerrymandering, the electoral college, and 2 senators per state.
Agreed.
The problem with that is who gets to decide what is on that test.
If it’s done in good faith then all is well. When it’s weaponized to prevent those with opposing opinions from voting then it’s a major problem
Agreed.
Then we may as well restrict impoverished groups of people who can’t get a good enough education from voting. Since they don’t vote, we should just pull even move funding from them. We should also make them work for their basic sustenances since they can’t contribute anything else. Let’s even quarantine them to certain areas to make sure they don’t put too much strain on our society. Without them having a voice, only working for basic necessities, and being confined, we should just call them slaves.
You didn’t just jump from a to c. You pole vaulted from a to z.
It’s illustrating the point of why restricting certain groups of people from voting is very ill-advised. It may seem like an extreme example, but it can get the point across.
It pretty much says that when you start to remove voting rights from some people based on something that may be out of their hands, it can open that system up to be abused. Just like what the US experienced with women and blacks. (We remember the Suffrage and Civil Rights Movements, right?)