• noneabove1182@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly an interesting thought and worth keeping in mind, I would love to see a lot more examples and more timing, especially for the pythonic ones, are they more efficient or just more python like?

    • ishanpage@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      OTOH, the more pythonic one will probably perform worse, but I’m not familiar enough with Python internals to make that claim without benchmarks.

      I’ll try it out and add the data in the article

      • Hazzard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh, the python one will probably perform better, because sum is probably written in native C under the hood.

        • jadero@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve yet to find a language where “doing it yourself” has higher performance than calling the built-in or library function. There are edge cases, but rarely enough to be bothered about.