• sobriquet@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    Serious question: are there places in the world that have marked pedestrian crossings (crosswalks), but vehicles DON’T have to give way to pedestrians?

    • Square Singer@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes, Germany.

      They have two types of pedestrian crosswalks. One of them is the standard “zebra crossing”, where the whole crosswalk is maked with white stripes and there pedestrians have right of way.

      The other one just has just dashes at the sides of the crossing, and here pedestrians have no right of way. But if these are present (same with the other type) pedestrians are not allowed to cross the road for iirc 50 meters left or right of the crossing. So it essentially turns the road left and right of the crossing into a “no crossing allowed” zone.

      They do this at traffic lights, so that if the light doesn’t work pedestrians don’t have right of way. And sometimes they just do it to annoy pedestrians, because it’s car-country Germany and fuck pedestrians or something.

    • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      In Prague, pedestrians officially have the right of way, but most drivers don’t seem to know that.

    • delaunayisation@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not long ago in Poland a pedestrian would have the right of way only after they were already on the crossing. So if you would get killed on a crosswalk that would be classified as intrusion and the driver would go scot-free

    • raptir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      In most states in the US, if the automobile traffic has the green light and the pedestrian traffic has a “don’t walk” sign, then the pedestrians are supposed to yield to the cars.

      • sobriquet@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sorry, I guess I should have more specific - if it’s a signalled pedestrian crossing, of course the signals need to be followed. I was wondering in the context of a crossing that only has markings, but no signals.

        • raptir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          It looks like it changed last year, but the UK. The law was previously that pedestrians in a crosswalk should wait until it was clear to start crossing, as opposed to cars should stop if someone is waiting to cross.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I remember in NJ USA as a kid being told that cars didn’t have to stop at zebra crossings. I don’t know if it was true, I wasn’t skeptically investigating things when I was 7.

          The best I could find was this blog talking about how the rules say they should stop, but they frequently don’t: https://www.expataussieinnj.com/understanding-road-rules-for-pedestrians-in-nj/

          So maybe the rules are one way, but the locals don’t follow it so you can’t treat the rule as being in place.