• Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    So OP is posting about Matt Taibbi, who is a writer who shills for this Centrism or “both parties bad” viewpoint. These talking points are often very subtle right-wing strategies. Matt is there to launder the right wing talking points of others and make them seem acceptable to US Liberals.

    The OP’s username being “Jimmy Dore is a Leftist” is yet another politically helpful lie. Jimmy Dore had this same centrist strategy, but now it’s impossible for anyone to deny he’s not just a reavtionary.

    And OP is also simping for Cornel West, another reactionary who is at the center of the “No Labels” party. This party is yet another piece of the centrist myth. And yet it’s funded by evil billionaires like Harlan Crow, who gives money to Clarence Thomas.

    These centrists not only hide their power level that is lie about their true political prescriptions, they are often there solely to fight the Democrats rather than the Republicans - an intentional spoiler third party. In the first past the post system, we are vulnerable to people voting this way rather than using gsme theory to deduce the only proper vote is for one of those two candidates.

    And this is all there to put a smudge on the reputation of Democrats. Because Republicans are never purists - they want to win, not be right.

    And Democrats do have problems worth discussing, but the game theory of the Presidential vote is this: any vote against Biden is a vote for Trump.

    So voting for Biden is Harm Reduction. His wins can delay fascism from taking over the US in 2025.

    • QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyzM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      This really shines light on that user’s motives. I banned that user because of being a really sus bot, but this meme will not be removed as no rules have been broken. Where I can learn more about the subject?

    • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fascinating and the most compelling argument that I have heard to date for the unsavoury practice of strategic voting.

    • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      And Democrats do have problems worth discussing, but the game theory of the Presidential vote is this: any vote against Biden is a vote for Trump.

      So voting for Biden is Harm Reduction. His wins can delay fascism from taking over the US in 2025

      Gotta say I hate that. I get these shills are playing the long game, but in the end, this is the same bullshit that got us in this predicament in the first place - vote for one because the other is worse!! We will never progress with that hanging over our heads.

      • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I despise the two-party system. Protest voting won’t magically give us the democracy we deserve. It has to be done on a small scale, local and state level. It’s gotta be organized. Governors are particularly invulnerable to this two-party bullshit, and that is I believe why a few states have Ranked Choice Voting now.

        And actually voters aren’t to blame. The founding fathers understood what they were doing to our democracy, and them saying a two party system must not be established was probably more of a dogwhistle that it should be done immediately because it will work.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          some of the founders were outspoken in their support of a two-party system. you don’t seem to know as much as you pretend.

          edit: or you’re lying.

          • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ll stop beating around the bush and say I think George Washington was lying. A few of our founding fathers had principles, but the most powerful of them were actually just reactionary elites using any narrative for power. So when he says don’t form a two party system, I think if he had the chance he would have done it himself.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We will never progress with that hanging over our heads.

        Which is horrifying recklessness on the part of Democrats. “Be happy with ‘not fascist’ because that’s the best we’re willing to do” only has to fail once.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Jimmy Dore had this same centrist strategy, but now it’s impossible for anyone to deny he’s not just a reavtionary.

      i deny it. i think he’s a dummy, maybe politically illiterate, but he’s not a reactionary.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Matt is there to launder the right wing talking points of others and make them seem acceptable to US Liberals.

      i dont think matt is talking to liberals at all: he’s talking to leftists.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      These centrists not only hide their power level

      the fact you would use this ACTUALLY FASCIST terminology makes me suspect you are either trying to paint them as fascists or are one yourself.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And Democrats do have problems worth discussing, but the game theory of the Presidential vote is this: any vote against Biden is a vote for Trump.

      wrong. only a vote for trump is a vote for trump. a vote for anyone else is a vote against trump.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So voting for Biden is Harm Reduction. His wins can delay fascism from taking over the US in 2025.

      you don’t know what harm reduction OR fascism is.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          harm reduction is accepting that a fascist is going to win whether they are democrat or republican and doing what you can to mitigate the harm that will be done by the current system.

          fascism is a strictly stratified society with every institution serving the interest of the state. democrats and republicans are both fascist parties.

          • blakerboy777@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Can you actually justify that claim? How are Democrats fascist? A definition broad enough to include American Democrats as fascist will presumably include just about ever major party in every western democracy.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              A definition broad enough to include American Democrats as fascist will presumably include just about ever major party in every western democracy.

              just wait til you discover mussolini.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      they are often there solely to fight the Democrats rather than the Republicans - an intentional spoiler third party. In the first past the post system, we are vulnerable to people voting this way rather than using gsme theory to deduce the only proper vote is for one of those two candidates.

      cornel west has said he’s running to defeat trump, and attacked him in the sean hannity interview. whatever your bias is, it doesn’t align with the facts.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Matt Taibbi, who is a writer who shills for this Centrism

      no he doesn’t

      or “both parties bad” viewpoint.

      that’s a different perspective entirely.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cornel West, another reactionary who is at the center of the “No Labels” party.

      this is just a lie.

      cornel west is a leftist and he’s running for the green party nomination.

      • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, you’re right. No Labels hasn’t chosen a candidate and Cornel West is indeed vying for the green party ticket.