I’m curious how software can be created and evolve over time. I’m afraid that at some point, we’ll realize there are issues with the software we’re using that can only be remedied by massive changes or a complete rewrite.

Are there any instances of this happening? Where something is designed with a flaw that doesn’t get realized until much later, necessitating scrapping the whole thing and starting from scratch?

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    And as I’ve understood and read about it, Wayland had been a near 10 years mess that ended up with a product as bad or perhaps worse than xorg.

    Not trying to rain on either parade, but x is like the Hubble telescope if we added new upgrades to it every 2 months. Its way past its end of life, doing things it was never designed for.

    Wayland seems… To be missing direction?

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I do not want to fight and say you misunderstood. Let’s just say you have been very influenced by one perspective.

      Wayland has taken a while to fully flesh out. Part of that has been delay by the original designers not wanting to compromise their vision. Most of it is just the time it takes to replace something mature ( X11 is 40 years old ). A lot of what feels like Wayland problems actually stem from applications not migrating yet.

      While there are things yet to do, the design of Wayland is proving itself to be better fundamentally. There are already things Wayland can do that X11 likely never will ( like HDR ). Wayland is significantly more secure.

      At this point, Wayland is either good enough or even superior for many people. It does not yet work perfectly for NVIDIA users which has more to do with NVIDIA’s choices than Wayland. Thankfully, it seems the biggest issues have been addressed and will come together around May.

      The desktop environments and toolkits used in the most popular distros default to Wayland anlready and will be Wayland only soon. Pretty much all the second tier desktop environments have plans to get to Wayland.

      We will exit 2024 with almost all distros using Wayland and the majority of users enjoying Wayland without issue.

      X11 is going to be around for a long time but, on Linux, almost nobody will run it directly by 2026.

      Wayland is hardly the Hubble.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well, as I said, it’s what I read. If it’s better than that, great. Thanks for correcting me

        Also, X is Hubble, not Wayland :)

    • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve been using Wayland on plasma 5 for a year or so now, and it looks like the recent Nvidia driver has merged, so it should be getting even better any minute now.

      I’ve used it for streaming on Linux with pipewire, overall no complaints.

    • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Wayland is the default for GNOME and KDE now, meaning before long it will become the default for the majority of all Linux users. And in addition, Xfce, Cinnamon and LXQt are also going to support it.