This idea has been kicking around in my head for a while, and I’m hoping some Lemmy geniuses can poke holes/ flesh it out with me.

Every person I’ve ever heard of works for and gets paid by some form of company. So instead of the company paying the workers and then those workers getting taxed, why not just tax it all to the corporations to begin with? Instead of hundreds of millions of individuals to think about, the IRS (in US) could just focus on a few million companies.

We the people democratically decide what we think is needed for a functioning society, and charge it to the corporations.

I’d say each company should be responsible for paying the same percentage of the bill as percentage of total “profits” they made. Like, if Apple makes 10% of all the combined profits of all the companies this quarter, they are responsible for paying 10% of the bill. Highest paid employee can make 10x what the lowest paid employee (including contracted and foreign workers) makes; more than that gets included in the calculation as part of the company’s “profits”. (So that CEO can still get paid absurd amounts of money, but the company will still pay taxes on most of it)

What if we created some sort of secure opinion/voting app where people go to cast their vote on whatever people think needs to be voted on. Should there be UBI? Should it be a token, living, or thriving wage? (Personally, I’d go with thriving and tie it to inflation) Single payer healthcare? All education paid for? Stop funding genocide? No more polluting the planet, or at least force companies to pay to clean up their own messes? When and where are companies allowed to market to us? Where should the threshold of agreement be to enact changes, 40% 50%+1 60%? Etc etc

Then we elect people who agree to simply enact what the people democratically agree on… And if the people don’t agree, they’ll stay away from it or leave it to the states. And hopefully someday we could build it out so that state and local governments work this way too.

I think we get bogged down on the 2 or 3 things we disagree on and allow that to mean we never get the things we DO agree on. Let’s get the things we agree on first, and then continue debating the things we disagree on.

Also I think this would be a long term plan. 12 years would give us 2 full election cycles here in the US and would give zoomers time to grow up, settle, and start to really vote (hopefully with this new system).

Anyway, like I said, let’s poke holes and figure out solutions. Thanks

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    each company should be responsible for paying the same percentage of the bill as percentage of total “profits” they made

    Revenue, not profit. After all we as individuals are taxed based on revenue.
    Stops all the tax haven horse shit.

    • Wes4Humanity@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree… I think I use revenue and profit interchangeably, since in this system there would be no profit until AFTER society gets paid for… And individuals would no longer be taxed on revenue or profit or whatever we want to call it

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Taxes aren’t the difference between revenue and profit.

        If you open a lemonade stand, and you buy 5 dollars worth of lemons, and 4 dollars worth of sugar your EXPENSES are 9 dollars.

        If you sell 5 lemonades at 2 dollars each, your REVENUE is 10 dollars.

        Your PROFIT is 1 dollar.

        Revenue and profit aren’t interchangeable no matter what taxation structure you imagine, because they’re fundamentally different concepts even irrespective of taxation altogether.