The Fediverse - especially the microblogging side of it - has deep issues when it comes to environmental sustainability.

And the high resource requirements, which result from an incredible level of redundancy, aren’t just bad environmentally: they make running a server more costly, and increase our reliance on Big Tech’s infrastructure.

I wrote about all this, along with some suggestions for how we can improve things somewhat.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    How about we do it because it makes us feel good, morally? How about we do it because we want to set a good example?

    This whole “I won’t change until those who are worse than I am change,” is so juvenile to me.

    • Handles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      No, I agree. It’s not about waiting out the bigger players. It’s making sure that everybody does their part!

      The fediverse has its footprint for sure and it’s great that we pull together to minimise that. I just want to put it in perspective at the same time and point out that federated services aren’t the only, or even biggest offenders here.

      Many of the hotshot technologies — cryptocurrencies a few years back, this season it’s “AI” — get launched without a thought of their environmental impacts, at a time where basically every MWh counts. I want to help with my fedi usage, but I also want that to be reflected in idiots’ bitcoin mining or GPT generated “content”.

      There has to be proportional balance.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Given all of that, I’d say it’s a good thing to get active and accuse these big environmental crooks, while at the same time being perfect examples of how to minimize our own footprint. Nobody will listen to accusations from someone who isn’t perfectly innocent themselves.