Former President Donald Trump hit the jackpot this spring when his social media company finally went public.

Even though Trump Media & Technology Group DJT generates very little revenue, investors are assigning an eye-popping valuation north of $9 billion to the company. Trump’s dominant stake in Trump Media is now valued at nearly $6 billion.

Yet new data shows its main product — the conservative-friendly social network Truth Social — remains a very tiny player in its industry, and it’s getting even smaller.

Truth Social’s average number of daily active US users on iOS and Android dropped by 19% year over year in April to about 113,000, according to data shared exclusively with CNN from Similarweb, a data intelligence company.

  • Wiz@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Truth Social’s average number of daily active US users on iOS and Android dropped by 19% year over year in April to about 113,000,

    Lordy that number is embarrassing, when comparing to Mastodon’s MAU count over 847k.

    And people actually paid money for this shit penny-stock.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      While I don’t disagree that Truth Social is wildly overvalued and compares poorly to many other social media networks, daily average users and monthly average users are two different metrics. You can’t directly compare them; daily average users will be a number smaller than monthly average users for a given network.

    • LimeZest@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      You are comparing a daily active users figure to a monthly active users figure. Truth Social has closer to 2 million active users overall, but only 100,000 on a given day. It’s still really low for a social media company with such a popular public figure at the forefront, but it isn’t lower than Mastodon. The valuation is absolutely absurd regardless as there are so many red flags in their own SEC filings.

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      2 months ago

      Let’s say you’re an organization (or foreign actor) who wants to get as many no-strings-attached dollars into Trump’s hands as possible. You can’t do that through campaign donations because those are watched way too closely. You can’t just cut him a check, because that looks suspicious too. What you can do however is buy stock in the company he mostly owns, and inflate the stock price as much as you want.

      • ApostleO@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        2 months ago

        Which explains why it was standard procedure for presidents to put their money in a blind trust. And why Trump didn’t.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          You can stop it by enforcing the Emoulents Clause, and forcing Presidents to disclose all of their finances, and prove they are not taking money from any Foreign government. But Conservatives are very selective about which parts of the Constitution are worth upholding.

  • Null User Object@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    How many of those 113,000 are just reporters waiting for Drumph’s next manufactured controversy to report on? Can they please just stop regurgitating every stupid thing he spouts?

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah also why the hell do they show up at the courthouse every single day after the trial and let him spew his lies? They don’t do that for other people on trial they just report what happened. Why does he get to make it a campaign speech?

  • S_204@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I commented on a Reddit post that rddt is worth less than djt currently. I hypothesized that awful moderation was worse than no moderation.

    Mod banned me lol.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Well, you were technically wrong, there are more shares of RDDT than DJT, so even though RDDT is cheaper per-share than DJT after yesterday’s close, RDDT’s total market cap is about $1B higher.

      Still no reason for a ban. Now that RDDT is publically traded and has a much higher profile, I wonder if some enterprising lawyer can figure out a class action lawsuit against Reddit for all the people who were banned from the site for bullshit reasons. You’d probably have to prove some actual harm, though. Most Reddit bans only hurt your pride.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Got to hand it to this guy. He pulled billions of dollars out of a hat. And just when things were starting to look pretty bad.

    Now he can basically afford to pay his way out of any penalty. Must be nice to be able to do that.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      He was bailed out, again.

      He was already bankrupt before running for presidency and Russia bailed him out.

      Now he is being bailed out by China.

    • drislands@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Probably, to be honest. Though of course that doesn’t speak to the quality of its content.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wouldn’t comparing it to Mastodon make more sense? And yes Mastodon is bigger and TS is even based on their server.

  • snownyte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Where were all of those 71 million voters? Was 113k all that they could get of them?

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re saying that people who vote for him should create accounts? I mean, I don’t think that that is all that surprising. I might vote for Biden over Trump because I prefer him as a president, but if Biden starts a social media company, I’m probably not gonna go move my social media activity there.