• orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Russian pacifists want Russia to stop invading Ukraine.

    Lemmygrad / Hexbear pacifists want Ukraine to appease Russia and give up territory.

    They are not the same.

    • trot [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Russian pacifists want Russia to stop invading Ukraine.

      Western “pacifists” want to send NATO tanks to Ukraine.

      They are not the same.

      Russian anti-war activists have a correct position.

      But an important consideration should be whether one’s actions actually contribute to Russia withdrawing sooner, or if they instead help justify further, equally self-interested NATO involvement in the war.

      Unless you are Russian, it’s most likely the latter.

      There are two imperialist blocs involved in the conflict, and it doesn’t matter which one of them technically started it.

      • orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There are two imperialist blocs involved in the conflict, and it doesn’t matter which one of them technically started it.

        I’m sorry, but when it involves one imperialist bloc invading a smaller country, then it does matter.

        Do you have the same position regarding the Vietnam war, Palestine, Iraq, and Afghanistan? Or do you only support whichever side is not aligned with the US?

        • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          53
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The Vietnam War? You mean the one where a rebel faction backed by Russia rose up against a smaller, recently established pro-Western government, and the US came to the defense of that government, because if they lost the enemy would surely keep expanding more and more across the entire region, and all the peace advocates were dismissed as supporting appeasement? That Vietnam war?

          Yes, we take a similar position on that as we do to this, do you?

          • orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Vietnam was opposing a puppet government imposed by the US.

            The Ukrainians opposed a Russian puppet government in 2013.

            Do you support both Vietnam and Ukraine?

            • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              50
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I support both the Vietnamese fighting against the South Vietnam puppet government and the Ukranians in the DPR fighting against the current Ukrainian puppet government, yes (though my support for the latter is more critical since they’re not communists)

              • orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                You did not answer my question.

                Did you support the Ukrainians rebelling against their government back in 2013. Or do you only support a side if that side happens to oppose the US?

                • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  41
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I disagree that the previous government was a puppet government.

                  My political aims go against the interests of the US, so generally groups that are aligned with my aims oppose and are opposed by the US. I don’t believe in judging every conflict as a disinterested third party with no consideration of past events or present conditions. The US has a long history of installing far-right governments, has an atrocious record of human rights, and violates sovereignty left and right, and that is relevant to who I support.

                  I do believe in giving critical support to just about anyone who’s willing to disrupt the unipolar world order in which the US has license to act as a rogue state. I want everyone involved in starting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to face a war crimes tribunal and be shot or hanged, and I support things that bring us closer to that goal. You, on the other hand, want to keep blindly trusting those same people to tell us who our enemies are. The only way to put any check on the US’s rampant militarism and aggression is through a multipolar world order.

                  • orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I disagree that the previous government was a puppet government.

                    Of course you do, that’s my point.

                    Tankies will support whichever government aligns with a power that is not the US. Even if that power is a capitalist oligarchy like Russia.

                    The US has a long history of installing far-right governments, has an atrocious record of human rights, and violates sovereignty left and right

                    They do, but the enemy of your enemy is not always your friend.

                    Specially when you take into account what Russia has done. They have a long history of erasing East European cultures (i.e. Russification), and genocide. So I do not trust them when it comes to Eastern European affairs, and neither do native people from those countries, most of support for Russia in those areas comes from Russian minorities (I wonder how they got there).

                • Sphere [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  31
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Those were violent right-wing militias, not peaceful protestors. Did you support the people rebelling against the US government on January 6th? Because that’s a genuinely analogous position to supporting the Maidan coup.

        • trot [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I literally said that

          Russian anti-war activists have a correct position.

          Are you aware that it’s possible to want neither NATO tanks nor Russian tanks in Ukraine?

          You can even make sure you are consistent with both things in action 100% of the time - it’s a neat little trick called “opposing the position of your own government”.

          • orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you aware that it’s possible to want neither NATO tanks nor Russian tanks in Ukraine?

            I am.

            But do you believe Ukraine is able to maintain their territory protected from Russia without NATO’s weapon supply?

            • Sphere [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              32
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              He most likely doesn’t believe Ukraine is able to maintain their territory protected from Russia with NATO’s weapon supply, and for good reason, given how clearly this is demonstrated by the utter failure of the vaunted counter-offensive. The only thing your position is really advocating is the useless deaths of vast numbers of Ukrainians (and Russians, for that matter).

              • The only thing your position is really advocating is the useless deaths of vast numbers of Ukrainians (and Russians, for that matter). [emphasis mine]

                They never admit it, but the fact that Russian deaths will continue is one of if not the main reason these NATO dronies are fine with sacrificing the lives of all those Ukrainians they pretend to care about. Spoiler warning: they don’t actually care about Ukrainians. But they’ll still couch it in terms as if they’re “supporting Ukraine.” Such “Ukraine supporters” are either completely, pathetically fooled by obvious NATO propaganda or they are just bloodthirsty bigots (or both, which is most often the case).

              • teichflamme@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The mere fact that they are in the act of a counter offensive after Russia tried to blitz then shows that it’s not even close to what you’re describing.

                Ukraine is holding their current territory pretty easily and gaining the upper hand very clearly.

                • ElChapoDeChapo [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  21
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Russia tried to blitz

                  The mere fact that you believe this shows how steeped in western propaganda you are

                  At no point was Russia’s strategy a blitz, this is a lie meant to equate Russia with nazi Germany and Pitin With Hitler even though it’s still ukkkraine celebrating Bandara as a national hero

                  No Russia’s gameplan from the start has been what it has been for almost 100 years, Soviet tactics not that that coked up nazi blitzkreig bullshit

                  The attack on Kiev was likely a feint

                  Ukraine is holding their current territory pretty easily and gaining the upper hand very clearly.

                  The cope levels are off the charts

                  • teichflamme@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yeah their Blitz was only a fake and their strategy is lose like they do right now.

                    Cope lmao

                • CamaradeBoina [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The famed counter offensive that western media has now described as incapable because of “ukrainians are too soviet brained” (the racism really did jump out lately), due to it absolutely failing to acheive its stated objectives, and leading to a situation far more reminsicent to WW1 murderous slog, and probably would have been even worse had Ukraine actually applied to a T the nonsense the US and more broadly NATO was telling them to do?

                  Brother it’s been months and we are talking few kms of wins, it’s longer than the already absolutely ridiculous Russian assault on Bakhmut, for far less.

                  It’s time to end this shit. A diplomatic resolution is crucial, and in terms of the POV of working class people in the west, we must stop the endless billions sent to maintain a steady flow of ukraiian and russian soldiers to the meat grinder, particularly given our own issues.

            • trot [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              25
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, just as it would be unable to resist NATO in being turned into a far-right paramilitary-led banana republic if Russia were to suddenly withdraw without any decrease in NATO involvement.

              But the beauty of the neat little trick above is that if the working classes of both sides correctly oppose their respective ruling classes’ interests, we can end up with a scenario where both sides lose - objectively the best outcome for the Ukrainian people, as well as everyone else.

              The Russian anti-war activists are clearly holding up their end of the bargain. Why are you not holding up yours?

              • CamaradeBoina [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                Exactly this.

                Revolutionary defeatism is the name of the word. Those who should be concerned with Russian imperialism must be russian working class people.

                We in the west have to fight against our own imperalists. It’s very simple and in the end very logical.

              • orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The Russian anti-war activists are clearly holding up their end of the bargain. Why are you not holding up yours?

                Ah! To be young and naive enough to believe that the anti-war activists in Russia have any leverage. They will all end up in Siberia or jumping out of a window.

                Any regime change in Russia will come from the oligarchs, and the Russian working class will still be in a bad position (if not worse).

                • trot [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  22
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  They did quite well in WW1.

                  Speaking of that, was the Entente was completely justified in sending millions to die in the war? After all, previously you said:

                  I’m sorry, but when it involves one imperialist bloc invading a smaller country, then it does matter.

                  Not even one, but two smaller countries! Think of little Belgium and Serbia!

                • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  20
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  To be young and naive enough to believe that the anti-war activists in Russia have any leverage

                  funny how shitlibs like you will gladly say stuff like this while in the very same breath talking about how russians are all evil orcs for genociding the smol bean ukranians and they need to be wiped out

                  also the “oh i am so worldly and wise” liberal condescension act is beyond tired. if you’re so old and venerable then just fucking die already, ghoul.

                  • orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    also the “oh i am so worldly and wise” liberal condescension act is beyond tired. if you’re so old and venerable then just fucking die already, ghoul.

                    😘

        • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The second you call Russia’s actions imperialist you just broadcast that you’re someone who just uses words for their impact and not their meaning and you should be completely disregarded in any conversation on the topic

          • SeaJ@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            TIL invading other countries and annexing their territories does not qualify as imperialism.

            • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It can involve that. But you’re using imperialism to “accuse them of what you’re doing before they can” by flattening all history and context away.

              Russia is defending itself from encirclement. Acting like you’re against imperialism rings hollow when you only apply it to an act of resistance to your empire expanding.

              • Encirclement by what? Countries that don’t like to suck off Russia anymore?

                Maybe Russia should act less like an authoritarian mafia state and then its neighbours wouln’t turn away from it. Food for thought

                • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Mind palace history. Ukraine turned away from Russia when the west sponsored a coup against the legitimately elected government and the regime they were replaced with was pro-west.

    • InappropriateEmote [comrade/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No, we want Ukraine to stop trying to ethnically cleanse the Donbas and give the people there self determination. And we want the Ukrainian government to stop forcibly conscripting people to go die needlessly on the front in a clearly losing war. We want NATO to stop enabling all of that (it literally wouldn’t be happening if they weren’t demanding that it continue). That’s what it is to be a peace activist. And I’m fairly sure I can speak for all of us, we are not pacifists, lol. But we are advocates for peace and the end to the horrible and needless loss of life.

      Nice try to completely twist reality, and completely misrepresent us, as you war mongering dronies always do.

      Edit: We actually give a shit about all the Ukrainian people being thrown into a fucking meat grinder. We care about their lives. The people who just say “more weapons to Ukraine!” do not give a shit about the lives of the people there. They’re happy to just let the war keep dragging on until the last capable Ukrainian is dead. An example of how WE feel about the tragedy of the situation: https://hexbear.net/post/503747 (hexbear link to a lemmygrad news post)

      • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Edit: We actually give a shit about all the Ukrainian people being thrown into a fucking meat grinder. We care about their lives. The people who just say “more weapons to Ukraine!” do not give a shit about the lives of the people there. They’re happy to just let the war keep dragging on until the last capable Ukrainian is dead. An example of how WE feel about the tragedy of the situation: https://hexbear.net/post/503747 (hexbear link to a lemmygrad news post)

        So be fucking outraged then that Russia started, and is continuing this war. They’re the ones killing Ukrainians in their homeland.

        A comment from that link:

        Omg, it’s a full on genocide of Ukrainian people. Just damm the Western libs… Fuck this planet.

        Russia is committing genocide. They’ve been raping and killing civilians since the start, this is where your anger and energy needs to be. Imagine being outraged at the nation defending itself from genocide, and those countries that are sending the tools that they’re being asked for to help defend themselves.

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’ve been raping and killing civilians since the start

          You know this is not genocide, right?

          You are describing war crimes. War crimes are horrible. Two rapes are two rapes too many. Every side in every war does them, which is a major reason war is so horrific. Genocide is much more than a series of war crimes, though. To believe otherwise is to declare all sides in all wars genocidal, rendering the word meaningless.

          • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’re kidnapping Ukrainian children and trying to “re-educate” them, and given Russian soldiers have had specific orders to “kill everyone” from commanders, and video evidence of random civilians being targeted and killed, I can’t really think what else is could be? Seems like they’re trying to eradicate the Ukrainian people and their culture.

            • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              25
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              They’re kidnapping Ukrainian children and trying to “re-educate” them

              Let’s start with a source for this one. I’ve seen nothing akin to the indigenous boarding schools ran by the U.S. and Canada in actual campaigns to destroy a people’s collective identity. What I have seen are reports of children whose parents are not available/alive to take care of them (a fact of any war) and Russia putting them in school and/or up for adoption (something any state would do).

              • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/18/how-ukraine-kidnapped-children-led-to-vladimir-putins-arrest-warrant-russia

                We meet just a few days before the international criminal court issued warrants for the arrest of Russian president Vladimir Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova, his commissioner for children’s rights, for directly supervising the atrocity of kidnapping Ukrainian children for “adoption” and “re-education” in Russia.

                I mean it’s a pretty well known enough to trigger an international arrest warrant.

                I’ve seen nothing akin to the indigenous boarding schools ran by the U.S. and Canada in actual campaigns to destroy a people’s collective identity.

                Classic hexbear whataboutism response. Like I’m going to sit here and defend the horrendous crimes that happened in those boarding schools. Both things are wrong. You can be critical of Russia my man, you don’t need to defend it so aggressively.

                • commiewithoutorgans [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  20
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Your linked articles makes literally no fact-claims outside of what my comrade there said. It just ignored whatever reasons Russia have and assumed the worst or let you imagine/fill in the gaps. Edit: added “no” because it was missing

                • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  16
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  International law is a joke. If you knew anything about it you wouldn’t be screeching “whataboutism!” at even the most obvious of comparisons, because you’d know that a cornerstone of what passes as International law is looking at practices of other countries.

                  But let’s see what your article says:

                  Kherson was liberated in November after eight months of occupation, but is pounded every day and night by Russian artillery… A report last October by Yale University Human Rights Lab, citing a vast range of open sources in Russia and Ukraine, traces many reasons for their abduction: including so-called “evacuation” from state institutions such as that at Kherson

                  This article documents that (when it was written) Kherson was still an active war zone, but nevertheless adds scare quotes to “evacuation,” as if there is no need to evacuate children from a war zone and this is all a Russian pretense. So early on we can see that no Russian explanation will be deemed credible, even when the explanation Russia gives (e.g., evacuation) is documented by the author himself.

                  “Staff hoped for three months that our army would somehow evacuate them,” Sagaydak continues, “but when it became apparent this would not happen, we made arrangements for those with living relatives

                  Even Ukranians recognize the need for evacuating children, but nope, it’s an evil plot when Russia does it! Note also that the immediate evidence we have here – an in-person interview with a Ukranian working with kids, not a second- or third-hand story – mentions exactly what I said: kids orphaned by the war who need to go somewhere, not Russians snatching kids from their parents.

                  “Another woman here, aged only 30, took five, which could not possibly have been hers, so we made up a legend that she was helping her pregnant sister while she gave birth. We had to invent all the medical records, and worried when a driver turned up who was not the one we had planned. But when they were stopped, and the untrustworthy driver even told the true story, the kids managed to outwit the occupying soldiers.”

                  What is more believable: Russians are trying to snatch any kid they can lay their hands on, for some reason the Ukrainians subjected to this believe fake medical records will prevent this, a driver tells them “hey here’s five kids with fake documents,” and the kids outwit a bunch of soldiers with some unexplained cunning? Or is it more likely that Russians consider kids in a war zone basically a nuisance, and aren’t particularly invested if someone is trying to evacuate them?

                  But then, on 15 July, the Russians returned, with 15 more children to be cared for

                  So the Russians are stealing children by… taking them to a Ukranian orphanage?

                  • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I mean, just look this shit up? There’s tonnes of articles, accounts from mothers trying to get their children back, UN reports on it, loads. Stop pretending like this isn’t happening, it’s absolutely ridiculous. Feels like I’m witnessing some kind of Russian information warfare in action here.

                    You know this is happening yet you’re coming out in defence of Russia.

        • radiofreeval [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You realize more fighting and more weapons doesn’t magicly win territory? It’s war, to continue fighting means killing more people and destroying more lives. The fighting needs to stop as soon as possible, one way or another or the whole country will end up like Bakmuht.

          • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So your answer is to let an aggressor nation just happily steamroll through any country it pleases? Because down to this logic, any nation that decides to defend their homeland just cause needless bloodshed. No fighting = no deaths, but the aggressor can literally just waltz in and take whatever it wants.

            The fighting needs to stop as soon as possible

            Agreed. Every effort needs to make sure Russia leaves Ukraine ASAP. Ideally without any more deaths. But unfortunately as long as Russia continues this pointless act of imperialism, then the death toll will rise.

            • radiofreeval [any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              27
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              So your answer is to keep the meatgrinder running for as long as possible? Sure, countless Ukrainians and Russians are dying, but at least the lines on the map don’t change.

              • CamaradeBoina [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                No the real answer is these people somehow think their constant egging on escalation instead of some sort of diplomatic resolution, won’t eventually lead inevitably to the war escaping its proxy status and evolve into a REAL inter-imperialist direct confrontation with all of what it implies (it implies nukes)

              • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                If Ukraine wants to remain a sovereign nation and retain its land, then what alternative does it have? I don’t think any nation in their right mind would happily let an invader just attack without putting up a defence.

                Russia themselves threw millions of men into the meat grinder to defeat the Nazis and so did the allies. So did the north Vietnamese against the US. It’s tragic, but it’s it’s unfortunately the reality when there’s bad actors that invade other nations.

                • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You think nazis are in this case the good actors because the genocide they were busy with got interrupted by an invader invited by the people you wanted killed off to protect them?

                  • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That’s it, keep peddling the Russian progaganda that the Ukrainians are Nazis and the Russians are humanitarian peacekeepers.

              • teichflamme@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The joke is that what you want has been done already when Russia invaded the Krim.

                How dumb do you have to be to think that Russia would not do the same shit again soon if Ukraine decides to do nothing?

            • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So your answer is to let an aggressor nation just happily steamroll through any country it pleases?

              You were happy enough to let Ukraine commit genocide until an ‘aggressor’ stopped it

              Every effort needs to make sure Russia leaves Ukraine ASAP

              So enlist. They’re out of warm bodies to throw at minefields and artillery kill zones. Instead of being so bloodthirsty with other people’s lives, put yours at risk.

              Why do you deserve to live if you want other people to die for your cause? Go die for your own cause. Go die with the rest of your nazi comrades.

              • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You were happy enough to let Ukraine commit genocide until an ‘aggressor’ stopped it

                No? Let’s not forget that Russia massively exaggerated the numbers this, whilst simultaneously also committing atrocities themselves, and then severely ramped it up in the invasion. It hasn’t stopped, it’s got significantly worse.

                Why don’t you go to Putin and ask him to pull out of Ukraine? Or go protest the war in Russia and build momentum to get the population to protest?

                Go die with the rest of your nazi comrades.

                Of course, you see all Ukrainians as Nazis. Explains why you’re so eager for Ukraine to roll over so Russia can come in take over the country and eradicate Ukraine and it’s culture.

                • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Let’s not forget that Russia massively exaggerated the numbers

                  “we were only doing a little genocide”

                  whilst

                  cringe

                  and then severely ramped it up in the invasion

                  Not after the invasion. After Ukraine reacted to its situation turning hopeless by turning to terrorist tactics like bombing civilian bridges during rush hour.

                  Why don’t you go to Putin and ask him to pull out of Ukraine?

                  Because unlike you I don’t wish for the genocide to continue until it’s successful.

                  Of course, you see all Ukrainians as Nazis.

                  No. Just the ones who took power in 2014 and have since made it illegal to oppose them politically while making national holidays out of WW2 nazi heroes. The ones you keep photographing with their nazi tattoos because you somehow can’t find all the good Ukrainians who aren’t sporting them.

                  It’s a nazi country. It’s run by and run for nazis. You’re defending them knowing this full well. You’re covering for them. That’s why I call them your comrades. You’re a nazi by action.

                  Explains why you’re so eager for Ukraine to roll over so Russia can come in take over the country and eradicate Ukraine and it’s culture.

                  Typical nazi rhetoric: either you let us purge anyone not like us or you’re doing oppressing us.

                  To say nothing of how fucking ignorant you are of the entire geopolitics around the war to say something so fucking stupid as to not even know why Russia is fighting. Shut the fuck up if you don’t know anything. Sophomoric linguistic punch-ups like ‘whilst’ do absolutely fucking nothing to mask the fact that you’re talking out of your ass.

                  • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That’s it, keep trying to discredit me by calling me a Nazi while you push your Kremlin propaganda.

                    It’s a nazi country. It’s run by and run for nazis. You’re defending them knowing this full well.

                    More Russian myths.

        • Clippy [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Gaddafi’s troops are committing rape to children en masse, they have issued viagra to mass rape people since the start. this is where your anger and energy need to be. Imagine being outraged at the nation defending itself from mass rape, and those countries that are sending the tools that they’re being asked for to help defend themselves.

            • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              26
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The Lybian war was started on lies and shattered the country so I don’t care if it was “legal”. Diplomatic routes in Ukraine were tried (e.g. the Minsk Agreements) but broken by Kiev. The Crimean people overwhelmingly supported the annexation.

            • Clippy [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              honestly i appreciate you attempting to engage this - truthfully, i find the entire premise of appealing to morality in a war fruitless, and my intentions in making the statement above was to imitate that this is a effect that has been repeated for many generations (whether or not it is true).

              ultimately people do things to advance their own goals & stamp out contradictions, not on the basis of morality.

              this attempt to say this is moral and that isn’t could go on until the next generation of soldiers is born - and it would be pointless because the narrative accepted will often be the media machine with the biggest wallet until some massive contradiction.

              ultimately what are your goals here, what are the perspective of the shoes of the russians and the ukrainians, what is the context etc.

              perhaps it’s as simply resolved as the issue of the jupiter missles, or perhaps peace was never going to be a option(from your stance of the “russian imperialists” or my stance that the American west desire to remain a world power).

              truthfully i am of the opinion the americans seeks to remain a world power [hence the 800 military bases around the world vs the russians 21], and will take advantage of any conflict to pose as the morally high ground in a “just war”, or proxy war in this case.

              i don’t think peace was ever an option, russia most likely sees ukraine as a staging ground for nato as it did in operation Barbarossa, or napoleon, or seeks minerals, or believes the new government is too nationalist for their own taste (why does it have to be one point?)

              all that matters is that is a war to extinguish contradictions that pose existential threats, another form of competition for capital.

              • Gsus4@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I did not appeal to morality, I stated the fact that the decision to helping the rebels in Lybia took into account every regional player given what we knew at the time. And even in that case it was counterproductive in hindsight.

                Following international law is not about morality, it’s about being able to vaguely know what you can count on and possible consequences when you perform a military calculation or a geopolitical move.

                If everyone just takes what they can get away with regardless of others’ interests, the future will just be a series of Iraq and Ukraine wars all over the world, particularly in Africa, Europe and Asia.

                • Clippy [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I did not appeal to morality, I stated the fact that the decision to helping the rebels in Lybia took into account every regional player given what we knew at the time. And even in that case it was counterproductive in hindsight.

                  i acknowledge this, i have no desire to struggle for the trough.

                  Following international law is not about morality, it’s about being able to vaguely know what you can count on and possible consequences when you perform a military calculation or a geopolitical move.

                  to follow law and order for the sake of law and order, you will find these rules tend to favour the well established, powerful and often rich governments. just like it once was deemed that to attack kings was deem sinful for they conversed with god. the rich and powerful will write laws that benefit them, while maneuvering around them with ease to cripple/destroy their enemies/threats.

                  the material reality on ground matters immensely, and we the west seek to capitalize on this opportunity (in the ukraine) to liquidate our enemies where ever, whenever possible.

                  If everyone just takes what they can get away with regardless of others’ interests, the future will just be a series of Iraq and Ukraine wars all over the world, particularly in Africa, Europe and Asia.

                  my friend, we will live to see many more wars, there are contradictions grander than this, (see ipcc report) - and i assure you, we will be portrayed as the good guys, with hollywood movies on how our soldiers going overseas to do these wars made us feel sad.

                • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  the decision to helping the rebels in Lybia took into account every regional player given what we knew at the time

                  Russia decided to help the rebels in Ukraine because they were being targeted for ethnic cleansing and asked for help explicitly

            • CamaradeBoina [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Libya today is a haven for islamic terrorism and slaver markets. Regardless of the “legality” of the NATO (mostly french and US led) intervention, it threw the entire region in outright chaos, and was enormously damaging to the working class of Lybia, but also of the entire fucking Sahel.

              • Gsus4@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yea, in hindsight it would have been better to just let him crack down on the population to keep stability in the region, but with the information we had at the time, most African and Arab neighbours agreed that helping the rebels with a no-fly zond would be better than not to, since the civil war was going to start anyway. You don’t care about legality, but that is not the point. The point is that this was not unilateral, like Iraq, and even then military interventions can go terribly wrong.

        • fuckiforgotmypasswor [comrade/them,any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          So be fucking outraged then that Russia started and is continuing this war

          its so weird that the day the tanks rolled over the border of Ukraine history magically just began, there was no material reality prior to this event, or any geopolitical events of consequence we could connect to this outcome, certainly none that had to do with openly threatening to expand a hostile military alliance with supersonic and nuclear missiles 5 minutes from the capital city of Moscow

          i wonder if the US has ever done the exact same thing in the name of national security and what the NATO heads said about it then

          every pro NATO take is certified baby brain shit that demonstrates nothing but a lack of understanding of material reality, history, geopolitics, on top of an absolute disregard for human life, gross hypocrisy and a level of false outrage that is always directly proportional to how loudly they’re calling to escalate bloodshed

          Russia is committing genocide. “So do the humanitarian thing and send depleted uranium shells to this warzone. Slava Ukraini!!!”

          log off dude

          • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            log off dude

            No :)

            RUSSIA BEST!!! RUSSIA THE PEACEKEEPERS!!! THE HUMANITARIANS! DEFEND RUSSIA AT ALL COSTS! SPREAD ALL THE RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA!! RUSSIA CAN DO NO WRONG! POOR POOR RUSSIA HAD NO CHOICE!!

            Am I doing it right?

            • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No. You’re not doing it right. You’re supposed to learn what the fuck you’re talking about first. And you didn’t so now you’re having a childish tantrum at people talking back to you.

              You think they told you to log off for their benefit and not your own? That’s twice you’ve said something stupid because you didn’t know what was going on around you.

              • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                They’re defending the imperialistic warmongering Russian state who are shelling and bombing civilians and who are literally creating the bloodbath.

                I’m not the one that needs to log off. But go ahead and keep shilling for Russia.

                • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Russia turned the other cheek for eight years as Ukraine continued breaking treaty after treaty and committing genocide on Russia’s border while at the same time threatening to host NATO nuclear weapons and invade their territory. They were dragged into this war by necessity. If I had any doubt in your typical American ignorance of foreign affairs, I would call you the warmonger. But I just call you an idiot.

                  Learn what the fuck you’re talking about. Stop using words for their impact alone.

                  • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Everything you’ve just said is textbook Russian myths. And you’ve got the audacity to tell me I don’t know what I’m talking about.

    • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Adding “jailing pacifists for speaking out” to the things dronies openly support, along with forcing others to fight when they’re not willing to, poisoning civilians with generations of birth defects, and giving cluster bombs to Nazis.

      The moral high ground, ladies and gents amerikkka-clap