Hey Fediverse -

I’ve been seeing a lot of discussion around the lack of game outlets that people like to follow nowadays. I used to follow a decent amount, but with how many of them have changed - Giant Bomb, PC Gamer, RockPaperShotgun, Game Informer - I also have been looking for a new outlet/community.

I’ve been working towards starting an outlet myself, and I’m wondering what folks would like to see out of one. My list:

  • Independent, or more so. Referral links make it hard to trust an outlet being unbiased if they have a financial incentive to promote things.
  • Discourse focused: Modern coverage, especially from influencers, is a lot of a singular person speaking. Giant Bomb especially had great dynamics between the various perspectives when covering a game.
  • Diverse Coverage: By this I mean, not just focused on AAA titles and the yearly release calendar. Covering mods, older titles, different communities (speedrunners, small multiplayer communities, etc.)

Other questions:

  • Would you be interested in supporting an outlet financially? Would you even if all content was available freely, eg. public media as opposed to “premium access.”
  • Do you have any preferred platforms? Would you be interested in an outlet that prioritizes the Fediverse over Twitch, Youtube, etc.?
  • Do you have a preference between written content, video, audio?
    • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can have an unbiased and objective opinion, pretty easily, in fact
      You simply don’t pretend your own opinions are facts everyone should take wholesale, and say as much

      • Poopfeast420@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        An opinion is always subjective, the opposite of objective. Reviews are also always subjective. There is no such thing as an objective review. This also means it can’t be unbiased, because a reviewers’ opinion will of course always be influenced by their experiences and stuff going on in their lives or the world.

        • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          which is why you clarify your opinions as such, removing the subjectivity from the objective parts.

          ffs, it’s called journalism

    • luciole (he/him)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah mate. I took a minute to search “objective opinion” and I’d suggest you do the same. It may look sort of oxymoronic but it’s definitely a time-honored expression. Opinions may be based on facts and analysis. An expert’s judgement is one valid definition for “opinion”.