Hi Lemmy, My HOA sent out a email saying dogs are no longer allowed on any grass in common areas or front yards including grass between sidewalk and curb which is… everywhere except our own tiny backyards. The reasoning is some dog urine effected dead spots. Honestly I didn’t even notice them, it’s 95° here and all the grass looks sad.

It’s a walking town and we are not a gated community, non-residents walk their dogs here all the time, so this rule can only punish those who live here and has no ability to effect others.

Anyway, this seems like a ‘we have tried nothing and we are all out of ideas!’ moment so I wanted to see if anyone here had any suggestions I can pass on to maintain a “good” curb appeal ground cover-wise while allowing dogs to do normal dog stuff.

I can converse with the HOA board in good faith, but this rule is basically banning dogs from the neighborhood - which I super did not sign up for.

Pertainent info: PA, USA - Town Home style homes - small central common grass - owned for 8y.

Edit: it seems like people may have glossed over the question part and skipped straight to HOA bashing (which is warranted at times!) so I will rephrase:

What ground covering or neighborhood solutions to similar (perceived) issues have other communities employed?

  • planish@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    1 year ago

    Check to make sure that the HOA actually has the power to do this. As a land owner you are bound to follow the covenants that run with the land, but you are only actually bound to follow those covenants. You don’t have to do random stuff just because the HOA board or even a majority of the HOA voters say so, you only actually have to do what’s in the covenants.

    Unless the covenants say that you agree to follow a bunch of dog-related rules to be defined later, you almost certainly are allowed to park your dog in your own front yard or in that of any consenting neighbor.

    • mysoulishome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      The HOA can pass an amendment or addendum to the covenants at any point, which then instantly enacts the rule and gives them the power to fine you and put a lien on your property if you don’t pay…with the caveat that I’m speaking about in the USA. Do other countries have HOA’s? You could go to a meeting or take them to court of course.

      • rammer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Most other countries do not have HOAs. In Finland where I live, municipalities can enact ordinances to limit what you can do on your property, but they are often very limited if they exist at all. The most restrictive ones that I know limit the type of house that can be built (eg. no flat roofs, although this can be a zoning issue as well), the color of the houses and other similar limitations.

        I’ll take my socialdemocrat “hell hole” of a country over the “free” USA with HOAs any time.

    • sadreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      45
      ·
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t look like HOA is telling OP, they can’t have dog piss on their property and looks like at least residents are not interested in providing consent here.

      I don’t think there is any legal right for dog owners to have their dogs piss in public or private areas accessible to public.

      Many people are tired of the increased costs other people’s dogs impose due to piss damage.

      • Captnkrk69@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wtf are you talking about… a animal doesn’t have the right to piss in public?? I really hope you did drop a /s. I’m going to assume you did, because this is not reddit etc…

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Strange as it sounds, it’s possible to stop animals pissing in public. Our HOA just installed laser turrets on every street to establish a no fly zone for birds, and birdshit has largely stopped.

          There is a new problem of insect infesations and bird carcasses on people’s properties though. Several people have been fined for leaving them there for more than an hour, but on the plus side that’s helping pay for the turrets, which are EXTREMELY expensive to purchase, maintain and power.

          There’s also been an uptick of plane crashes nearby caused by sudden pilot blindness, but we’re told that’s an issue of personal responsibility on the part of the pilots. They’ve been advised to take regular eye tests.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Our HOA just installed laser turrets on every street to establish a no fly zone for birds,

            Wtf? Please tell me this is satire.

            • atrielienz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah. There’s no way they’re serious. The FAA would come down on that HOA like the CIA on an off the reservation drug cartel.

        • sadreality@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Animal is property, it has no rights per se. Dog owner has no right to take their property ie dog to someone’s else property to piss and shit.

          • atrielienz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            This rules limits members from having their own dogs pee on their own property. Literally you own a dog and now cannot allow that dog to go to the bathroom in the front yard you own and maintain.

      • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why is it parks that have dogs slashing all over them all the time still grow fine? What naff turf are these people using on their lawns that dies off due to a bit of wee?

        • canihasaccount@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In California, Arizona, and the like, dog pee will kill off grass at the park, too. Lots of places have grass that should have desert climate flora, and dog pee does damage there.

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My inlaws have a herd of Chihuahuas and they’ve actually managed to kill big patches of lawn along with about half the shrubs bordering their yard with all the piss. I think this rule is stupid and HOAs are dog shit but this stuff can damage plants.

  • Mamertine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Find out when the next meeting is. Tell them you’re going to attend.

    Organize all the other dog owners and all of you attend. Explain why the new rule is a burden on you all. Explain what you want. Listen to their reasoning. Come to an agreeable compromise.

  • iluminae@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A complicating factor: I would say ~50% of the houses are rented and only the homeowners have a say in HOA matters. So, assuming any owners without dogs (including the whole board) and any landlord would logically vote to ban all use of the grass, while all dog-owning homeowners would vote to allow dogs near the grass.

    Obviously that’s generalizing what the votes would be - even though the majority of the houses have dogs, I would say the minority are homeowners with dogs.

    The reason I bring this up is a petition-style response may be dismissed as “well those dog owners have no say as they are not homeowners”

      • iluminae@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I actually don’t know if a landlord has to do anything to keep a renter happy these days? Or if there is enough demand that they would not care? Not sure, perhaps I am approaching that question pessimistically.

      • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most landlords would be more than happy if their renters dog died… You tried to get a lease with a dog lately? Unless you have something like a teacup poodle a vast majority of landlords don’t want to lease to you.

          • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            They can damage property. People let their dogs chew on stuff, pee on the floor etc. Dogs are also an insurance issue. When I bought my house several insurance companies didn’t want to insure me because I had a German Shepard.

          • vagrantprodigy@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because dogs tend to cause damage to rental properties. I was looking recently, and at least 80% of the rentals in my area had chew marks, claw marks, etc on doors and walls.

      • ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        In a vacuum, yes. But what if some of them have been there for a few years and are paying below-market rent? Or are generally dicks but not egregious enough to go to the trouble of evicting?

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Get on the board and take that shit down from the inside, only reliable way to destroy those parasites.

      I live in an area where most houses predate HOAs and home values are too statically low for anyone to want one, but if I were in a position where an HOA started passing nonsensical rules like that I would 100% be reading every rules document and figuring out how to get in charge in order to dismantle every single rule until the only thing the HOA does is pay for necessary/agreed upon shared services

  • joel_feila@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Former real estate agent here

    All you can do is talk to the hoa board. That is it. If they won’t listen then you have no options. Other then pointing out this wont solve the problem and only punish members. Good luck.

      • joel_feila@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well assuming such a position is open Some hoa I know were set up that the head is 20 year position. One hoa had it so 1 guy had complete veto power and the way to get rid of him was to wait for every plot of land in the hoa to sell. This was out in west Texas and 10 years ago. They have not sold all of them and he is still in charge.

      • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Local governments love HOAs and they are only giving construction permits to HOA communities. Why they love it? Easy, they onload the government duties of maintaining infrastructure on the HOAs, who charge a “tax” that doesn’t risks the political career of the elected officials.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m pretty sure it’s a case of gradually increased powers, afaik basically everywhere has HOAs, the difference is just that outside of america they basically just maintain common infrastructure like roads and utilities and the only things they can really enforce is when you’re actually being a prick towards your neighbours, e.g. bright pink house or excessive blinking lights.

  • itsshortstuff@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve read some folks being a bottle of water on walks to dilute the pee so it’s less likely to ruin grass. But in fairness if some dog pee is ruining grass, owners are not watering their lawns enough. There are plenty of dogs in my neighborhood that are walked and I don’t think there are many pee spot issues.

    But even better would be to not use grass :) uses too much water in the first place hehe

    • SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone not from the US. What in the world are you guys doing with your grass that makes it need watering and gets ruined by dog pee?

      I have lived around dogs my entire life and never seen any grass get miscolourd by their pee.

      • Canis_76@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        As someone not from the US, your pets probably aren’t fed horrible food options multiple times throughout the day. You (your fellows in general) probably got your pet knowing it wasn’t an ornament. And you probably don’t have grass that is so heavily genetically modified that it can’t filter the poison most of these animals piddle out. Yes, we get burn spots in lawns. Yes also, most of us are slowly killing our pets. Who has time to train an animal? Who has time to feed them a diet that is remotely in tune with their biology?

        • legion02@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          What are you talking about? The grass burns from dog pee because urine has nitrogen in it and the grass is over fertilized.

  • paholg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is this legal? My understanding is that the strip of grass between the sidewalk and street is “semi-private”, in that the homeowner has to maintain it, but that the city actually owns it.

    I’d check local laws and see if the HOA has any right to restrict dogs there.

    • bustrpoindextr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      HOAs have excessive rights especially newer ones and this is probably actually legal. The city likely owns none of it btw.

      HOAs are a blight on American home ownership, John Oliver did a segment on it, but new HOA contracts are crazy if you haven’t had a peek at one.

  • Heavybell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am still confused how these “home owner associations” have any legal right to tell you to do anything…

    • elscallr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      When you buy the house you sign a contract giving them authority over certain things. You’re bound by the terms of the contract.

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is it not possible to just not sign that contract? All contracts can be changed and if part of selling the house is that you are not beholden to the HOA, why is it forced on you?

        Why does the HOA have any authority in the sale of a house? The contract is between the buyer, seller, and their financial institutions. Anyone else is unnecessary.

        • elscallr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not, not if you want to buy the house. The way it works is this:

          I’m a property developer and I want to put in a new area of housing. Well that’s gonna be expensive up front, roads have to be paved, utilities like power and sewage ran, and houses and common areas built. That’s all very expensive, my incentive for doing so is that the property values will remain high. So before I sell a house to anyone, I establish an HOA and require anyone who wishes to buy a house to sign the contract for it. You don’t want to sign the contract, you don’t buy the house. That contract also includes a stipulation that if you sell the house you have to include the provision for the HOA.

          Now HOAs can be dissolved. Once enough people own houses that they can form their own HOA board they are free to do so, and usually do. That board then takes over the control of the content of those contracts including the provision requiring their signing. So if you want to dissolve an HOA you get on the board or lobby your neighbors to do so, call a meeting, and dissolve it. If you can get enough of your neighbors to agree, the HOA is gone.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s usually some bullshit to allow the developer to retain control indefinitely. There will be provisions for the turnover, but the stipulations will involve something that won’t happen for sixty years.

            • SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              But HOAs are communities right? Doesn’t a HOA meeting have super authority, to remove bylaws like that?

              No community I know of in Dutch legislation can block a community (‘vereniging’) from dissolving itself. Moreso since there’s always a law above it on how to disband a community, which cannot be bypassed.

              • Serinus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, I don’t believe we have that kind of protection here. I don’t know enough details to say what kind of protections (if any) we do have.

              • elscallr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Any HOA can dissolve itself, it merely requires the consent and vote of the board. The rules on how that happens are in the HOA’s bylaws. There’s nothing in law preventing them from doing so.

                This is mostly governed under American contract law.

        • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s possible to not buy the house, but the covenant/contract comes with it. Can’t do one without the other. When it’s formed the owner and the HOA have an agreement that no sale of an HOA’d property can take place without the buyer also agreeing to be in the HOA. The HOA has authority given to them by the owner of the property.

      • elscallr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hard to find one without an HOA these days. And HOAs are usually full of people who want to exert power over other people but don’t have the intelligence or ambition to climb any higher.

  • iluminae@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    In an additional effort to refocus this thread to ground cover, has anyone here in the northeast US gone with a clover ground cover, rather than grass?