• *Tagger*@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    The 400k is a lie. It was over a million. The 400k figure was if they had applied for a tax break they didn’t apply for and had been granted it.

    • The_one_and_only@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you are correcting figures one way, you have to correct them both ways. That is how financial auditors always work.

      • *Tagger*@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m really sorry, please forgive my ignorance, but I don’t know what you mean.

        • The_one_and_only@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I am a financial accountant in a fairly large company. When external auditors look at the figures, they add up everything that they find. It doesn’t matter if the error is increasing or decreasing the profit-figure, they calculate the total of the errors.

          • *Tagger*@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Ah, okay, that makes sense I guess. Seems weird from a lay point of view, but if that’s the industry standard.

            Thanks for explaining.