The European Commission has published an official list of services offered by ‘gatekeepers’ that must comply with obligations under the new Digital Markets Act. Companies now have six months to comply with the rules.

  • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 year ago

    Major messaging apps will have an obligation to make themselves interoperable with competitors

    Government mandated fediverse lmao.

  • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Broadly, the DMA is the EU’s attempt to rein in the market power of Big Tech by opening up entrenched platforms and curbing ecosystem lock-in and anti-competitive behavior, making them compete on the merits of their products and services alone. Major messaging apps will have an obligation to make themselves interoperable with competitors, for example, while operating systems will need to be designed to offer third-party app stores and allow developers to offer alternative in-app payment options.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Good. At least there’s one significant regulatory body on this planet that understands how a capitalistic system is meant to be regulated. You don’t need something to be an actual, 100% monopoly before you take the kid gloves off and force them to cooperate with other businesses.

  • randomaccount43543@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Full list of gatekeepers’ core platform services that must comply with the Digital Markets Act:

    • Social Networks: TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn
    • N-IICS (aka messaging services): WhatsApp, Messenger
    • Intermediation: Google Maps, Google Play, Google Shopping, Amazon Marketplace, Apple’s App Store, Meta Marketplace
    • Video Sharing: YouTube
    • Advertising services: Google, Amazon, Meta
    • Web Browsers: Chrome, Safari
    • Search: Google Search
    • Operating Systems: Android, iOS, Windows
      • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Google was forced to provide statistics on its user base and they wouldn’t have been listed if they wouldn’t get 10% of EU citizens to use their product at least once a month.

        I can’t tell you in what countries Google Shopping is actually used, but its inclusion int he list says a lot.

        I think it’s because you get Google Shopping results whenever you search for a product name or brand. They pushed their shop right front and center and now they’ll have to pay the price.

        • randomaccount43543@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes. I guess you are using Google Shopping every time you make a Google search of a product, even though you don’t notice it.

          • If my suspicions are true then they’ve really messed up, there’s no way their accidental clicks are worth the difficulty of complying with DSA regulations.

            I think the same may be true of Bing Search, I don’t think their user base is anywhere as large as they’re made out to be but every time you accidentally click a link in Windows you get forced into Edge and Bing. It’s not hard to cross the 45 million users threshold when everyone only needs to click one Microsoft link inside Windows once per month to count!

    • Microsoft has already announced that it will alter Windows 11 to open links in the default browser rather than in Edge. Not even a day has passed since this has gone into effect and the results are already promising!

      Of course Microsoft will only bring this change to European computers, but other countries are free to make their own antitrust laws if they want to accomplish this too.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The European Commission has officially confirmed which tech companies, and which of their services, count as “gatekeepers” under its strict new Digital Markets Act (DMA).

    Broadly, the DMA is the EU’s attempt to rein in the market power of Big Tech by opening up entrenched platforms and curbing ecosystem lock-in and anti-competitive behavior, making them compete on the merits of their products and services alone.

    Samsung, which appeared on the previous list, successfully argued that it does not meet the threshold for being a gatekeeper with its internet browser.

    Likewise Microsoft’s Bing search engine, Edge browser, and advertising service are not on the list, but the Commission says it’s opening market investigations to assess whether they meet the bar for regulation.

    The Commission has said these investigation will take no more than five months, but could result in Apple being forced to make iMessage interoperable with competing services upon request.

    Meanwhile the likes of Google Search (and Bing, if it ends up being included) will have to give their users a choice of other search engines, while operating system providers will need to offer the ability to uninstall pre-installed apps and change system defaults like virtual assistants and web browsers.


    The original article contains 604 words, the summary contains 200 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • georgette@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Switzerland isn’t part of the European Union, only the Schengen zone. So company’s won’t have to decide by these laws in Switzerland

  • Steeve@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait, where’s iMessage? That’s like one of the most popular messaging apps lmao

      • Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess, but not too far behind relative to smaller messaging services right, seeing as Apple has 26% of the smartphone market share in the EU? And shouldn’t their global reach be at least somewhat considered? Seems like regulation aimed to allow smaller businesses to gain market share is letting one of the biggest companies in the world slip through.

        • Dips@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          26% means that you cannot use it to talk to 74% of your friends. So European users usually use a service that runs equally well on iOS and Android.

          • Steeve@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Right, but my point was more that since a quarter of the EU uses iPhone they have iMessage by default, which could then quickly increase their userbase to a top competitor if they’re able to increase their EU smartphone market share.

      • YⓄ乙 @aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Really? I thought apple is a trillion dollar company because of europeans but guess its americans giving apple all their money lol

    • atomkarinca@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      they have 5 months to prove that it’s not a gatekeeping service, if they cannot do that then it will be added to the list. the list gets updated every 6 months.

  • Black AOC@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We might only hope this regulatory body has more teeth than their Amerikan counterparts. Otherwise, these megacorps will just pay the fine-- which will no doubt be seen as little more than “the cost of ‘doing business’” for them.

    • atomkarinca@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      "What will be the consequences of non-compliance?

      Fines: of up to 10% of the company’s total worldwide annual turnover, or up to 20% in the event of repeated infringements"

      it’s a tough pill to swallow.

      • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Microsoft had an annual turnover of 212 billion USD in 2023, so a 10% fine of that would be 21,2 billion dollars. Yeah I think they’d rather comply

  • Audbol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hope for MacOS not make the list? It’s probably the most gate kept thing that exists