• Pronell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I have never thought of Red Lobster as particularly ‘affordable’, nor ‘beloved’ as the article repeatedly insists.

    I’m not taking sides at all, I’m sure the facts behind the article stand for themselves, but it feels like an attempt to be a sob story when a beleaguered and overpriced restaurant chain goes under - even if it was drowned.

    • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s peak “middle class fancy” to me. It’s not cheap, has not been for a while. But it’s the kind of place you could bring three kids and feel fancy, yet not totally blow the budget. It’s not “fine dining” but it’s a cosplay for a large demographic

    • Fester@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The problem where I live is that there aren’t any other options for seafood-focused restaurants, and the fanciest of local regular restaurants are similarly priced ($100-150 for two) or cheaper while also serving much better food. The few places that are “higher tier” than that are weird old people bars that have giant spread-eagle nude paintings on the walls and their food is always disappointing.

      There’s nothing wrong with properly frozen seafood, so at the rate we went to Red Lobster, maybe twice per year, we’re better off satisfying our seafood cravings by buying at the store and preparing it at home. It will taste better at about 1/3 the price. We can spend our “fancy date” money at a local restaurant and have consistently better experiences all around.

      TBH I’m looking forward to Red Lobster not being an option anymore. Support your local restaurants.