• cmbabul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    28 days ago

    So I 100% agree most CEOs especially at major companies could easily be replaced by AI, but this also sounds like the start of a dystopian sci fi novel.

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      28 days ago

      It was a twilight zone plot.

      It started with a CEO acquiring a robot replaced all the workers to save money and increase efficiency.

      Eventually, the robot deemed the CEO inefficient and booted him to the street.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      Yeah I’m all for dismantling corporate hierarchy, but even as a socialist, I concede that people managers can be workers. They can be valuable.

      Just not to the extent that they get to belong to a different economic class.

      If it’s just going to mean more profit to shareholders (who aren’t workers) then, as a worker, and customer, and even as a shareholder, I couldn’t care one dried out cat turd’s worth if a company is more profitable.

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        28 days ago

        Managing people in a workplace is a very valuable skill, I think the issue is IME those with those skills are rarely put in management positions

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        Yeah I’m all for dismantling corporate hierarchy, but even as a socialist, I concede that people managers can be workers. They can be valuable.

        You’re describing the work of middle (or probably more likely, lower level) management. You know, the people actually interacting with the workers.

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Yeah I’m being charitable, because there is value in someone who coordinates other high level managers, and handles interacting with the public and other companies.

          But without public stocks, the case for a CEO starts to wear thin IMO