• TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        67
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. And were fined. But that’s perfunctory so that they can make more money smuggling oil. The sanctions are solely enforced by the U.S., without consent of the UN.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          80
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes.

          Your own link argues against you:

          "But the Suez Rajan case was unique at the time of the transfer because it was owned by the Los Angeles-based private equity firm Oaktree Capital Management. "

          At the time the ship was being used for moving US sanctioned oil, it was own by a US company. That supports @[email protected] 's statements.

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            66
            ·
            1 year ago

            That is correct and why they could prosecute this case. But they have been seizing oil since 2019. And even if all those tankers were partially owned by US companies, it still doesn’t change the fact that this amounts to piracy. Defending international injustice with legalese doesn’t absolve what this is. When China seizes our tankers because the parts were made in China, will you defend them?

            • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              49
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              And even if all those tankers were partially owned by US companies,

              If the tankers or company is operating in the US, then they are bound by US laws no matter where they are in the world. A company can’t benefit from the protection of the US government and laws at home only to go abroad to commit US crimes.

              • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                50
                ·
                1 year ago

                Many countries can use that justification. Why are you defending an act that you’d condemn if it was done to America?

                • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  36
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re really committed to the act, even after multiple people have pointed out your error in reading this situation. Kudos to you I guess?

                  • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    31
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    It’s not an act. I care about this world I live in. I don’t debate to convince the people that disagree with me. I do it to show that those people don’t use logic and reason to decide their beliefs. They want the illusion of confirmation bias. I try to disrupt that illusion. We need to see the world from different perspectives.

    • deft@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The contraband cargo is now the subject of a civil forfeiture action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The United States’ forfeiture complaint alleges that the oil aboard the vessel is subject to forfeiture based on U.S. terrorism and money laundering statutes.

      The complaint alleges a scheme involving multiple entities affiliated with Iran’s IRGC and the IRGC-Qods Force (IRGC-QF) to covertly sell and transport Iranian oil to a customer abroad. Participants in the scheme attempted to disguise the origin of the oil using ship-to-ship transfers, false automatic identification system reporting, falsified documents and other means. The complaint further alleges that the charterer of the vessel used the U.S. financial system to facilitate the transportation of Iranian oil

        • TheBlue22@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I could not give less of a fuck what a people like you think or believe. Your “arguments” are born out of propaganda. Hell, half of your fucking posts I’ve seem were “this is written by a website based in a country I don’t like”, too bad truth is not written by propaganda websites you love to browse.

          Go back to hexbear, grad, or whatever shithole you crawled out of, degenerate tankie scum