readbeanicecream@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social · 1 year agoThe US government wants to label secure IoT devices with a 'Cyber Trust Mark' | Engadgetwww.engadget.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up13arrow-down1external-linkThe US government wants to label secure IoT devices with a 'Cyber Trust Mark' | Engadgetwww.engadget.comreadbeanicecream@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social · 1 year agomessage-square5fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarereadbeanicecream@kbin.socialOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago@conciselyverbose It is these reasons I try to avoid smart everything (or as much as I can). It just seems so invasive.
minus-squareconciselyverbose@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI’d love to roll my own, eg if/when open source or standalone hardware that doesn’t rely on external services is an option. The major players agreeing on Thread means it might be a plausible option at some point. But right now it’s a minefield.
@conciselyverbose It is these reasons I try to avoid smart everything (or as much as I can). It just seems so invasive.
I’d love to roll my own, eg if/when open source or standalone hardware that doesn’t rely on external services is an option. The major players agreeing on Thread means it might be a plausible option at some point.
But right now it’s a minefield.